|


YouTube™ Channel
RSS Feeds twitter™

Visa revocation not political nor instrument of foreign policy

Ask The US Embassy

Wednesday, March 10, 2010



Q: There is a lot of talk in the news about your embassy revoking the visas of Jamaican citizens. I am sure I have nothing to worry about myself, but I am still curious -- can you explain why visas are revoked and the actual process of revocation? Is there any way to check on the status of my visa, just in case?

A: All countries' ability to revoke a visa is an important tool in the effort to ensure that foreign citizens only travel to the intended country for the purposes for which they are authorised to travel. In essence, any country can revoke any visa when it is determined that the holder no longer qualifies for the visa.

According to United States immigration law, the decision to revoke an individual's visa is done on a case-by-case basis according to the facts of each particular visa holder's situation. The decision to revoke a visa is not political nor is it an instrument of foreign policy. It is based solely on the application of United States immigration law, regarding a particular individual's continued eligibility for a visa which (s)he has already been issued.

Who has the authority to revoke a visa?

Under section 221(i) of the US Immigration and Nationality Act, the only people authorised to revoke a visa are consular officers at US embassies and the Secretary of State in Washington, DC. It is important, however, not to confuse revocation with cancellation. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) officials have the authority to cancel a visa at the port-of-entry if they deem the visa holder to be inadmissable. This is because a visa only grants the holder the right to apply for entry into the United States at the port-of-entry; a visa does not grant the holder the right to enter the country -- that can only be done by an officer of the CBP. When a visa is cancelled at the port-of-entry by CBP officials, the inteding traveller is sent back to the country of origin where he or she may reapply for a new visa at the US Embassy.

Under what circumstances is a visa revoked?

The fact a visa has been revoked does not necessarily indicate something negative about the visa holder, nor does it mean that the visa holder will never be able to obtain another visa. It only means that subsequent to the issuance of a visa, evidence came to light to suggest that the visa holder may be ineligible to retain that visa under the laws of the United States. A consular officer may revoke a non-immigrant visa under various circumstances, including, but not limited to, the following:

* The visa holder has been issued an immigrant visa;

* The visa has been physically removed from the passport in which it was issued;

* The visa holder is ineligible to enter the United States for reasons relating to health, public safety, and national security; or

* The visa holder no longer qualifies for the visa they were issued.

Many of the visas revoked at the embassy are revoked after a visa holder has died, in order to prevent future misuse of the visa by a third party. Even if a visa is revoked because information came to light to suggest a visa holder was either ineligible to enter the United States or no longer qualified for the visa, that person is not necessarily barred from applying for or obtaining another visa.

To protect the national interest of the United States, visas may be revoked promptly after information becomes available that refutes a visa holder's eligibility to hold a visa under US law. After a visa is revoked, consular officers rely on the visa application process to resolve any outstanding issues, should the visa holder wish to reapply. If the visa holder does reapply for a visa, a consular officer will carefully screen his application and make a definitive determination of eligibility. This includes reviewing whether the grounds for revocation were inaccurate or if the circumstances surrounding the revocation have changed, either of which may result in the issuance of a new visa.

What is the process for revoking a visa?

According to regulations, once a consular officer decides to revoke a visa the officer must, if practicable:

* Notify the visa holder of the intention to revoke the visa;

* Allow the visa holder the opportunity to show why the visa should not be revoked; and

* Request the visa holder present the passport in which the visa was issued for physical cancellation.

Most visa revocations occur at the embassy, where all three requirements are easily met during an in-person interview. When a revocation takes place at the State Department in Washington, DC, however, the Department notifies the local embassy of the action so that officers at the consular section can notify the former visa holder. When a visa is being -- or has been -- revoked without the visa holder present, every effort is made to contact the individual to inform them of the decision. Once notified by the State Department of such an action, embassy officials do not delay in trying to notify the person involved. When contacted, that person is asked to present their passport at the embassy so that the visa can be physically cancelled. The failure of the visa holder to bring in the visa for physical cancellation, however, does not affect the validity of the revocation.

Since a thorough effort is made to contact every visa holder who has had their visa revoked, any current visa holder who has not been contacted by the embassy should assume that their visa is still valid. Due to the sheer number of visa holders in Jamaica, the embassy is not in a position to respond to any inquiries regarding the status of a particular visa.

The Department of State regulations relating to visa revocations can be found in the Department's Foreign Affairs Manual, at 9 FAM 41.122. The Foreign Affairs Manual is available for public viewing at the State Department's website, www.state.gov.

The American Embassy staff in Kingston will answer any questions you may have regarding US consular law, regulations and/or practice. In order to respect the privacy of applicants, the embassy will not answer questions on specific personal applications.

Send your questions to: editorial@jamaicaobserver.com and we will send them to the embassy.


POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha 3106043f19cb4f47b3ed983e82e7836d
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (7)

Richard Mahoney
3/10/2010
uno caan stay deh, The US will use what ever resources at their disposal to impliment their agenda including but not limited to revoking and cancelling visas my question is. Is the don worth it. just something to thing about.
Karen Lee
3/10/2010
yep...these procedures were carried out...however my question is
1. why didnt they inform him when he went to the embassy for a visa for a family member.
2. did his revocation happened after his appointment with the embassy
3. When his revocation happened, did they make any effort to contact him before his due travel to the US?
we will never know...two of my boyfriends coworkers went to the embassy to renew their visa and they were turned down. And they say it is not political...yeah right
mike willy
3/10/2010
I have been saying all along that there must be reason/s for cancelling Mr Wayne Chin visa.
JA Cynic
3/10/2010
This is the official governmental response.
The Honduran recent experience inWeapon of Mass Visa Revocation (WMVR) will be regarded as an "exception". Politicians, businessmen, even judges were subject to this "aberration"
Official policy does not condone Iran "contra" deals, assination, coups, destabilization,interference in domestic affairs, kidnapping,economic pressure, etc. etc.
JA Cynic

3/10/2010
Anybody out there has gone through this procedure of revocation can enlighten us if this is exactly what has happened? I am having jitters about turning up at the airport.
Hope Alive
3/10/2010
If this information is true, then it begs the question, "what is Mr. Chin's offense?"

3/10/2010
Were these procedures carried out for Wayne Chen ie prior to revocation?

Today's Cartoon


Poll

Did you watch American football's Super Bowl on Sunday? 
Yes, but just for the advertisements
Yes, just for the game itself
Yes, for both the game and advertisements
No, I did not watch the Super Bowl.

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: