|


YouTube™ Channel
RSS Feeds twitter™

Barbarism, Mrs Macaulay

Monday, March 15, 2010



Dear Editor,

I am all the way in Cumbria, UK, reading the article where Margarette Macaulay is unleashing a furious attack on men who commit incest. One can relate to the anger that Mrs Macaulay feels, but in her capacity as attorney and women's and children's rights advocate, I would say she is sending the wrong message in a country that is already obsessed with crime and extreme criminal practices.

I guarantee that anyone reading this article will have a good laugh because they find what Mrs Macaulay said was somewhat amusing, but really, none of it is funny and incest should never be dealt with in that way. Incest, like any other "abnormal (or normal) behaviour", starts in the brain and anyone wanting to engage in behaviours of that nature will use anything at their disposal; for example, fingers, tongue, etc. What Mrs Macaulay should be doing is to try to engage with a team of psychologists and medics to help to bring about a change in people with such warped ideas.

Mrs Macaulay should take into consideration that cutting off the organ in a case of incest will not stop the music playing, since a recording has already been made in the mind of the perpetrator. And any family member who has had to be subjected to abuse of that nature needs a different sort of weapon to annihilate such sick behaviour. She, more than anyone else should know that no country would pass such a law to "cut it off"; not even Mrs Macaulay herself as an attorney could do that, even if she had the opportunity. But now having put it into the heads of thousands of people reading the article, she may eventually have to defend someone who was daft enough to take her advice.

We are now well into the 21st century and such barbarism should have been left well behind us. The last thing our young people should be encouraged to do is to cut off organs.

Monica Cousins

monco2000@yahoo.co.uk


POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha 72382a16f82140a397d1acaadd3c6367
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (1)

Verna Kitson
3/16/2010
excellent response, Monica! I read the article and could not even engage it because I thought this was the least useful approach possible, and rather strange coming from her. But then again, what is published as "opinion" in our newspapers is not usually the product of a rigorous process of putting an argument together. Too often than not, it's just a step above bar room talk.

Today's Cartoon


Poll

Did you watch American football's Super Bowl on Sunday? 
Yes, but just for the advertisements
Yes, just for the game itself
Yes, for both the game and advertisements
No, I did not watch the Super Bowl.

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: