Let's track our children through schools

Tuesday, September 02, 2014    

Print this page Email A Friend!

Dear Editor,

As we enter the start of another academic year, administrators, parents and students will face recurring conflicts. There are no easy fixes on grouping, social promotion or retention and screening for external examinations.

Scholarly articles have been written to support placing the highest-achieving students in one cluster and the lowest in another. Then there is tracking — having proficiency dictate which classes students would take. There are strong arguments against grouping as critics feel it perpetuates inequalities, but there are equally strong arguments by proponents.

I was able to focus my instruction and increase student achievement between my GCSE Higher and Foundations tiers. The resurgence and popularity of Gifted and Talented programmes are on the rise again, giving a fair stretch to top-tier students, some of whom now take college courses while finishing high school. Similarly, special education programmes also give that fair stretch to students with learning disabilities or who just happen to be slower than their classmates.

In the 1970s, students and parents received four successive years of report cards and nearly everyone knew and accepted why they ended up in 5A, 5B or 5C, etc. Today, we have made strides in parent-teacher communication; parents don't have to wait; there is now electronic grade book software with parent access. Today, a student has more power to shift upwards through the groupings.

Most teachers are hard-working and patient and want as many students as possible to pass their CSECs or IGCSEs, but they should never recommend a student who is not at the level for a serious attempt at mastery or pass. Decision making is not flippant and parents who monitor gradebooks or keep in touch with teachers would already know which subjects their children can take.

It is argued that schools screen out potential failures to boost their pass rates. What is the fix? What is the alternative to screening? I propose that the data on screening numbers be presented alongside the pass rates in the interest of full disclosure. Another fix is that more parent-teacher partnerships be fostered to lower the number of students who perform poorly and fail screen tests. Almost every parent has a cellphone and could be more influential in their children's academic life. If they learn how to use their phones to vote for their favourite stars they can certainly learn how to access the school to telephone a teacher.

Sandra M. Taylor Wiggan






1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

comments powered by Disqus


Do you support the Gov’t giving US$200,000 towards staging the Racers Grand Prix 2017? 

View Results »


Today's Cartoon

Click image to view full size editorial cartoon