Woman gets in trouble for taking money she claimed is owed to her after leaving company

Sunday, February 17, 2019

Print this page Email A Friend!


A young woman, who was on training at a juice company but returned and stole $11,000 after she quit, told the Kingston and St Andrew Parish Court that the money she took was owed to her, after disputing the amount.

Aniece Prendergast, who was arrested and charged with simple larceny, admitted to taking the money from the cash register at the company but claimed she took only $6,000 as she was not paid upon leaving the company.

“What a thing tho,” Parish Judge Maxine Ellis uttered.

The young woman's lawyer, Michelle Thomas, explained that her client had asked her employer to pay over the money but it was not forthcoming.

“So who is going to settle the discrepancy,” the judge then asked.

Thomas in reply pointed out that other persons had access to the cash register, but was told by the judge not to go down that route.

Turning to Prendergast, Judge Ellis said: “Most persons who are separated from their job they write a letter and ask for what they are owed. They don't go and take it.

“Why you believe you should go and give yourself the money?” the judge further asked.

The complainant, who was present, then explained that Lawrence had signed a contract to undergo two weeks training as she did not have all the qualifications for the position at the company. She further pointed out that the agreement was for her to be paid a stipend of $6,000 after completing the training but she quit before the end date.

The complainant told the court that Prendergast, prior to her departure, had been reprimanded several times for her behaviour to superiors and for late coming.

“She did not turn up one day but call the next day demanding money, so I told her to come in for a meeting and on that day she was late. After I call her, she sent a text with all kinds of words saying she is not afraid to go back to jail,” the complainant said in court.

Prendergast, however, told the court that she did not sign a contract and that the only paper she signed was the application form.

The judge, however, asked her if she is willing to repay the complainant the money that she took and she complied. A date was set for her to return to court for sentencing on March 13.


Now you can read the Jamaica Observer ePaper anytime, anywhere. The Jamaica Observer ePaper is available to you at home or at work, and is the same edition as the printed copy available at http://bit.ly/epaperlive


ADVERTISEMENT




POST A COMMENT

HOUSE RULES

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper � email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy



comments powered by Disqus
ADVERTISEMENT

Poll

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Today's Cartoon

Click image to view full size editorial cartoon
ADVERTISEMENT