|

Business

Another Ponzi scheme uncovered in the Caribbean

Friday, July 02, 2010



THE US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced fraud charges and an emergency asset freeze against a financier based in the US Virgin Islands (USVI) who perpetrated a US$105 million Ponzi scheme against investors for the past six years at least.

The SEC alleges that Daniel Spitzer, a resident of St Thomas USVI, used several entities and sales agents to misrepresent to investors that their money would be put in investment funds that, in turn, would be invested primarily in foreign currency. Investors were falsely told that Spitzer's funds had never lost money and historically produced profitable annual returns that one year reached over 180 per cent.

Spitzer instead used money raised from new investors to pay earlier investors, and misappropriated investor funds to pay unrelated business expenses, the SEC claimed, adding that he concealed his scheme by issuing phony documents to investors that led them to believe their investments were profiting.

According to the SEC, Spitzer conducted his fraudulent scheme, which involved 400 investors, from at least 2004.

The SEC has obtained an emergency court order freezing the assets of Spitzer and his companies. Among other things, the court order requires that he repatriate all assets located overseas to the US.

"Daniel Spitzer ran an elaborate Ponzi scheme that he disguised by moving investor money through a complex network of foreign bank and brokerage accounts," said Merri Jo Gillette, Director of the SEC's Chicago Regional Office. "He deceived investors into believing that he was using a sophisticated investment strategy that didn't really exist."

According to the SEC's complaint, Spitzer only invested approximately US$30 million of the more than US$105 million he raised from investors. Of that amount, Spitzer used approximately US$13.5 million to invest through an offshore entity via a bank account in the Netherlands Antilles. These investments, some of which were placed in a French financial institution, lost money and were subsequently liquidated.

The SEC said that Spitzer used another US$16 million to invest in money market funds that earned only a few thousand dollars. Spitzer liquidated these investments as well. After the investments were liquidated, the money was returned to Spitzer, and he used it to repay investors in Ponzi-like fashion. To cover up his scheme, Spitzer issued to his investors false Schedule K-1s that showed inflated returns and led them to believe that their investments were profitable.

The SEC's complaint alleges that Spitzer used offshore bank accounts to pay purported business expenses of his companies. Spitzer deposited investor funds into bank accounts at the National Bank of Anguilla and the First Bank of Puerto Rico, from which he paid more than US$15 million in purported operating expenses and payments to himself and various sales agents. Spitzer also used more than US$4.8 million to pay third-party business expenses.

According to the SEC's complaint, as recently as March this year, Spitzer obtained US$100,000 from an investor for an investment in one of his purportedly more conservative investment funds. Rather than invest the money, Spitzer used a portion of the money the following month to pay other investors and third-party expenses.


POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha 09de2e093c6e498797ec4a75c052c307
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (0)

AGI's share value could be listed below its capital base

  0 comments

 

Jamaica needs many more Barclay Ewarts to drive a manufacturing renaissance

  0 comments

 

'Thief racked up a $380,000 bill on my credit card'

  0 comments

 

Last house standing

  0 comments

 

Mission Possible

  0 comments

 

Erica Wynter: Helping small businesses deal with the paperwork

  0 comments

 

'Get dressed up and corporate mingle'

  0 comments

 

Cargo airline expands operations from Miami to Montego Bay

  0 comments

 

POLLS: Did you watch the Super Bowl?

  0 comments

 

US on pace for US$1T deficit despite January dip

  0 comments

 

Greek PM says default would lead to 'chaos'

  0 comments

 

...Trade deficit widens

  0 comments

 

Key events in the history of Eastman Kodak

  0 comments

 

Spurring growth in the C'bbean

  0 comments

 

Columbus Communications makes multibillion-dollar telecoms investment in the region

  0 comments

 

Finance Minister Phillips' very difficult task

  4 comments

 

Jamaicansmusic.com goes global

  0 comments

 

Jamaican homeowners facing serious troubles

  0 comments

 

How safe is the air you breathe, the surface you touch and the food you eat?

  0 comments

 

Airlift still high on regional agenda

  0 comments

 

Today's Cartoon


Poll

Did you watch American football's Super Bowl on Sunday? 
Yes, but just for the advertisements
Yes, just for the game itself
Yes, for both the game and advertisements
No, I did not watch the Super Bowl.

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: