|

Business

LNG drama raises more questions than answers

BY AL EDWARDS

Sunday, June 27, 2010



Last week the Office of the Contractor General (OCG) took the unprecedented step of sending a Special Audit Team to the Petroleum Corporation of Jamaica (PCJ) and the Ministry of Energy and Mining to take into custody records associated with the procurement processes that led to last week's announcement that the Exmar Consortium was approved by Cabinet as the preferred bidder to establish a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Regasification Terminal and Natural Gas Transportation System in Jamaica.

Copies of the computer e-mail files of several former and present senior PCJ and ministry officials have been requested by the OCG five-person Audit Team.

Controversy swirls around the bid process and questions are being asked of all concerned parties. The minister of energy and mining James Robertson has been on a quest to extol the virtues of LNG, claiming it will save the country somewhere in the region of US$900 million. However, he was not totally forthcoming in announcing that the former chairman of the PCJ Ian Moore is a major shareholder of Caribbean LNG (Jamaica), part of the Exmar Consortium.

This has led to questions of conflict of interest, thus sullying the bid process. Contractor General Greg Christie is determined to ascertain who else is connected to the bid process. What are their interests? Was there use of proprietary insider information and who stands to gain from fast-tracking this LNG project?

Focus should be placed on a national energy policy

Jamaica's oil bill is a major line on the Balance of Payments (BOP) and for the last few years it has cost the country around US$1.5 billion a year -- a considerable sum considering that the country's total GDP comes to US$12 billion. The question then is, how does the Government reduce its fuel bill in an effective manner? The PetroCaribe arrangement with Venezuela was an answer of sorts and the Government has entertained the notion of Exploration and Production (E&P) for oil and gas, offshore Jamaica.

Over the last few weeks, the minister of energy and mining has nailed his colours to the mast of LNG. But sector analysts and manufacturers have said they would like to see Jamaica adopt a diversified energy policy.

Brad Addington, formerly of LatAm Energy, speaking with Sunday Finance from Houston said: "I'm not familiar with Jamaica's energy policy. It is not a gas province like Trinidad & Tobago, and as far as I know, it does not have any upstream or downstream infrastructure. Speaking with Schlumberger executives it is very clear that Jamaica at this time does not have a clear discernible energy policy. For instance, what percentage of its energy use comes from renewable sources? Is it prepared to utilise indigenous energy supplies to offset its dependence on imported fuels? What and where are its energy reserves should a crisis befall the country? Can its electricity generating capacity be improved commensurate with the development of the country? You have to have a defined energy policy before you run ahead and declare you are going LNG. Before your minister can begin to opt for LNG, he has to have a national energy policy with LNG being one among different energy supplies. That's my opinion."

Robertson has said that LNG is cheaper than oil and he is right. He has also said that at this time it is a buyer's market and he is right again. But LNG is a commodity subject to the vagaries of price fluctuation.

Who could have foreseen that oil would hit US$140 a barrel two years ago? He is determining energy cost savings at today's prices, which cannot be a reason to stake the country's energy future on just LNG.

Rather than rushing to the bid process, he would be better served formulating and championing a diverse energy policy for the country which is cost-effective and helps both residential users and the productive sector.

Take lessons from Brazil

Umoe Oije of Smedvig Offshore said: "For a small island state such as Jamaica you have to factor in how best to utilise your natural resources. The question that has to be asked therefore is, what are Jamaica's natural resources? It is not natural gas, that's for sure. Brazil had to face a similar situation in the 70s when sky-rocketing oil prices threatened to wreck the economy. So what did it do? It looked to its natural resources to offset costs. Its Programa Nacional do Alcol (National Alcohol Programme) is a study for Jamaica's minister of energy. This was an exercise by the Government to phase out all vehicle fuels derived from fossil fuels in favour of ethanol. It reduced by 10 million the number of cars running on gasoline in Brazil, so reducing the country's dependence on oil imports. Brazil has the largest sugar cane crop in the world and is the largest exporter of ethanol. It makes sense to utilise what you have.

"Jamaica has plenty of sunshine and sugar cane, so they both must be factors in its energy policy. It cannot rely predominantly on LNG. Today Brazil, perhaps the world's premier emerging economy, employs oil, natural gas, wind energy, biofuels, coal, oil shale, solar power, hydro power and uranium in its energy usage. In fact, 50 per cent of its telecommunications systems and 50 per cent of its rural energy systems come from solar power."

The importance of transparency and a fair bidding process

The Exmar deal has left Minister Roberston with a few questions to answer.

Did he do his utmost to see to it that all protocols of transparency were observed? Did he put in place a due diligence exercise programme that would ensure that the bid process would not be tarnished? Has he identified a reliable source of gas that can serve the country for at least the next two decades and has he told the nation so?

So why did Minister Robertson have to suffer the ignominy of having his department raided by the OCG?

According to the OCG, it received an anonymous complaint, dated Wednesday 16, 2010, which alluded, among other things, to allegations of impropriety and irregularity in the selection of the Exmar Consortium as the "preferred bidder".

A prominent local retailer who requested anonymity said: "The minister and his minions have been aggressively pushing the merits of LNG, particularly in the Press. However, they have given very little details on the bid process and the parties involved. Who is Exmar? What experience does it have with LNG projects? What projects has it completed? Who is Caribbean LNG (Jamaica)? What experience does it have? If Jamaica's energy use is going to be placed in an operator's hands then it is vital that the country knows as much as possible about that operator.

Christie concerned about offshore company and its shareholders

Speaking with Sunday Finance, Contractor General Christie said that the move by the OCG was unprecedented and that a thorough investigation would now transpire. He said that with all Government contracts it was important that concerned parties declare their interests prior to the bid process and furthermore, transparency should prevail. He would not be drawn on how many parties bid for the contract but said that the results of the investigation would unfold in due course.

Christie, in his news release on the issue, said that the records of the Registrar of Companies of Jamaica have revealed that Caribbean LNG (Jamaica) Limited was incorporated in Jamaica on June 19, 2009, approximately seven months after Moore demitted office as the chairman of the PCJ in November 2008.

Moore and a Paul East are listed as directors of the company but they are not listed as shareholders," the contractor general said, adding that "a Mr Al Kerr and "Bogle, Andrew (Ceased)" are listed as the other directors of the company."

The OCG also said it had a concern about the possibility of 'bid-rigging', and that "because the majority shareholder of Caribbean LNG (Jamaica) Limited is an entity which is registered off-shore in the BVI and whose current human shareholders are unknown, there is a concern as to whether there are any Jamaican 'connected persons' or public officers who, by virtue of their being beneficial shareholders of Caribbean LNG (Jamaica) Limited, will improperly benefit from the contract which is to be awarded by the PCJ to the Exmar Consortium".



POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha 635112a5afea48bebefb181f8e8327d2
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (11)

Canueth Jones
6/28/2010
http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2010/06/fracking-in-pennsylvania-201006.
Found an interesting article about how costly LNG can be to some people.. interesting!
Marlon Dyer
6/28/2010
I would love to see research from the Min. of Energy on the difference in cost between LNG, wind, solar, coal.
daryl whyte
6/28/2010
I like the idea of an energy policy mix that includes Renewables - wind, solar, hydro, etc.. But everybody knows the big drawback with renewables is the COST. The cost recovery time is much longer than for coal or gas. Right now, Jamaica need a Cheap and Clean energy source as our primary energy source.

daryl whyte
6/28/2010
I agree. Time for the delays to stop. We've been suffering for years with expensve electricity bills. Just before christmas 23 of my co-works got laid off because of sky-high utiltiy bills - not just light. Even the water bill is affected by high light bills, our general manager told us.
Donald Chung
6/28/2010
Good job Mr. Christie! The National Energy policy needs to be revamped and we do not want to be tied up into LNG and still subject to fluctuations in supply prices non-renewable resources that do not give a reasonable cost benefit ratio. We should encourage biomass, wind and solar, while seeking Ultra safe Nuclear power from China using our Most Favoured Nation relationship with them, and Ambassador "lightning" Bolt at the helm. It's all about visionary leadership, and our grandchildren.
Kimani Leon
6/27/2010
The OCG likes to investigate, and in the meantime we paying more and more for the light bill.


Marlon Dyer
6/27/2010
This article seems to contradict last week Sunday's Observer article. Last week you said the gas industry operates on 20-year contracts, and that the consortium would need to secure a contract fairly soon. If that's so, why would Jamaica be vulnerable to price fluctuations? Looking out for clarification.
rudolph reynolds
6/27/2010
Very good article. Our leaders lack vision. How does the minister know LNG will remain a buyers' market? Is Jamaica the only country who is aware of this buyers' market for LNG? Are we smarter than everyone else? If the answer is no, then, we can expect demand to drive up LNG prices in very short order. LNG will not solve Jamaica's energy problems. We have invested so much in ethanol. Why not go the ethanol route like brazil did? It will also help the environment. Good job CG.
Ana Tomlinson
6/27/2010
i just cant understand what all this fuss about. We pay an enormous amount of money on oil every year. Someone came up with an idea of a cheaper source,got the nod of approval and what happened? Instead of asking questions like, what kind of savings will we benefit from on a yearly basis, how will our bills be affected both privately and commercially and other such questions we opt for character assasination.
Could this be that the usual light skinned guys are not involved?
Soni Warren
6/27/2010
Greg Christie, I salute you! Keep up the good work.
Farruk BMA
6/27/2010
Gwaan Mr Christie, weed them out. The country is behind you. The old ways of doing business must stop. In the post-Dudus era everything must be transparent and above board.

Achieving Impossible Dreams

  0 comments

 

World Bank slates promotion agencies

  0 comments

 

NCB to list in New York for US$225m

  1 comments

 

Divestment team prepares Air J's response

  1 comments

 

Let there be LEDs

  1 comments

 

Down 90% - JPS leads the way as corporate profits slide

  2 comments

 

Shareholder grills PCFS board

  0 comments

 

Ditch LNG, go green — global think tank

  0 comments

 

Current value opportunities in the market

  0 comments

 

Organisers: Don't mess with the Olympic brand

  0 comments

 

Where are Facebook's friends? Stock slide deepens

  0 comments

 

IMF calls on UK to do more to boost economy

  0 comments

 

The justice of interim payments

  0 comments

 

Budget alone won't fix the tax system

  0 comments

 

Survey backs reform plan

  0 comments

 

Eurozone warned of 'severe recession'

  0 comments

 

Oil prices hold at lows

  0 comments

 

What's your company's social media policy?

  0 comments

 

For sale: potable seawater

  0 comments

 

Argentina’s economic boom ends

  0 comments

 

Today's Cartoon


Poll

 Do you feel buying into Facebook now is a good investment for the long-run? 
Yes
No

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: