Business
Robertson sidelines ethanol in renewable energy push
BY PATRICK FOSTER Business reporter fosterp@jamaicaobserver.com
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
ENERGY Minister James Robertson yesterday dismissed ethanol as a prime alternative energy source to help Jamaica reduce it debilitating oil bill in an apparent about-turn on Government's energy policy direction.
"You will not hear me talking about ethanol," Robertson declared at a special meeting held with energy stakeholders at the Observer's Beechwood headquarters in Kingston to discuss the introduction of liquefied natural gas (LNG).
An increased use of ethanol has long been touted by Government as a part of its solution in reducing the island's annual oil bill, which stood at some US$1.4 billion in 2009.
But Robertson argued that a wide-scale conversion of sugar cane to ethanol would affect the production of rum by reducing the availability of molasses, which already is being imported.
"We import 49 per cent of our molasses to go with the 51 per cent locally produced so we can stamp the rum made in Jamaica," said Robertson.
"We are short on molasses," he emphasised.
Robertson instead argued that using sugar cane for bio-mass was a more pragmatic approach in renewable energy sourcing.
Government recently announced the award of a contract to Belgian company Exmar for the construction of a floating regasification unit to convert LNG for supply to the Jamaica Public Service (JPS) and bauxite companies.
The energy minister, in defending the push to introduce LNG, said yesterday that if the fuel was being used from three years ago, savings to the JPS would be approximately US$900 million.
Last year, JPS' fuel bill totalled US$466 million, and the company spent US$140 million on fuel for the first three months of 2010.
However, despite Robertson's sidelining of ethanol, he insisted that LNG's introduction was not at the expense of local renewable energy.
According to Robertson, LNG, being the cheapest fuel now available, has to be used to offset the cost of oil and provide an alternative for the island's base load.
"Renewables are not effective and don't bring down your base load cost," Robertson argued, adding that sources such as hydroelectric and wind, were on the contrary, expensive to produce and inconsistent.
"Your strategy must be to address the base load, which is what [we] are now trying to do," Fitzroy Vidal, senior energy engineer at the ministry of energy, emphasised.
"You are bringing in cheaper fuel and given the opportunity to replace old expensive generators," he added.
At the same time, Pat LaStrapes, representing CH-IV, a company hired to provide technical advice to Government sought to quell concerns about LNG price increasing in response to demand or the world oil price.
"The whole idea of LNG is the reduced cost," he said while insisting that there is no correlation between the LNG pricing and that of crude oil.
Robertson hinged his increase on renewable energy sources on the expected stability in LNG pricing.
"If we lock in LNG supplies for a 20-year contract where the gas is so cheap, the more successful we are there, then more renewables we can bring in," said Robertson.
The use of renewable sources, which stands at eight per cent of the total electricity supply, is projected to be increased to 15 per cent by 2020 and 20 per cent in 2030, according to government's recently released energy policy.
In the meantime, Robertson said that the Wigton Wind Farm, located in Manchester, is expected to be in a profitable position in 24 months.
"Losses of up to $100 million per year which would stop anybody from wanting to invest has been addressed by this policy," said Robertson.
POST A COMMENT
You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.
HOUSE RULES
1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.
2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.
3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.
4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.
5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.
6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.
7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.
7/1/2010
Okay, lets say we move to LNG. How much will it cost the J.P.S. to convert to LNG usage? Won't they want to recoup that cost? If so will the cost to the consumer be less in the short term of remain the same? Just wondering.
7/1/2010
LNG will just be another reason to keep prices and profits high
7/1/2010
Ethonal can be produced from hemp grown on marginal land 10,000,s of jobs created and 100, of billions of dollars in import substution and energy independence. the worked out buxite lands can be used and in growning the mighty weed and as a by products breakdown the damged soil as i write this reply i am in the process of investing in the market
6/30/2010
Trying to understand what is being said her. It seems ethanol is been taken off the table of alternatives because it may adversely affect rum production? Seems shortsighted. Sugar cane is not the only source of ethanol is it?
6/30/2010
Point taken and noted Minister!
So, LNG will save us lots of money. Hallelujah!
Let us now turn our attention to the environmental advantages of such usage i.e. carbon credits, it being a clean fuel with no smoke, etc...
Yes, we love cheaper alternatives but it is also time for us to think and grow green.
6/30/2010
My God is this for real...'JPS' fuel bill totaled US$466 million, and the company spent US$140 million on fuel for the first three months of 2010', I need to see better information, more communication on the benefits of LNG. I am watching to see if the govt. really going to stop and start again. Cant they see the people are suffering, business are suffering...HOW COME?
6/30/2010
JPS' fuel bill totaled US$466 million, and the company spent US$140 million on fuel for the first three months of 2010. WOW. No wonder I cannot afford my light bill... lest stop the procrastination. Each and every hardworking Jamaicans have been suffering for too long with expense electricity bills. When the LNG project was announced I felt hopeful, yes I did. Now, this investigation makes me wonder Is the government serious? Too much red tape, it seems to me, on a critical issue to Jamaica.
Other Stories
Spurring growth in the C'bbean
0 comments
Columbus Communications makes multibillion-dollar telecoms investment in the region
0 comments
Finance Minister Phillips' very difficult task
2 comments
Jamaicansmusic.com goes global
0 comments
Jamaican homeowners facing serious troubles
0 comments
How safe is the air you breathe, the surface you touch and the food you eat?
0 comments
Airlift still high on regional agenda
0 comments
0 comments
0 comments
'LESS THAN JUNK': S&P lowers Belize's credit rating deeper
0 comments
Barbados consortium wins regional ferry contract
0 comments
Montserrat 'ready' for geothermal energy developers
0 comments
Working group set up to study Caricom associate membership
0 comments
'Republic' records TT$272-million profit
0 comments
ManU third in football money league behind Spanish giants Real and Barca
0 comments
BMW aims for top spot in 2012 as luxury sales soar
0 comments
Toyota's net income drops by over 50 per cent
0 comments
The Art and Science of Making Money
0 comments
0 comments
MJ Body Concept Spa proved you have to keep trying
0 comments




