Wal-Mart sued over payments to agency staff

Wednesday, October 24, 2012    

Print this page Email A Friend!

NEW YORK, USA — WAL-MART Stores is being slapped with a lawsuit that claims the world’s largest retailer and its staffing agencies broke federal minimum wage and overtime laws by requiring temporary workers to appear early for work, stay late to complete work and work through lunches and breaks without compensation.

According to the proposed class action suit that was filed Monday in the US District Court of Illinois Eastern Division, Labour Ready and QPS, two of the staffing agencies that the discounter used in the Chicago area, failed to provide workers assigned to the Wal-Mart stores with required employment information.

The suit also claims that Wal-Mart itself failed to keep accurate records of workers’ time. That has made it difficult for workers to make claims that they were not paid by the temporary agencies for all hours worked. The suit also claims that the discounter and its staffing agencies also failed to pay the plaintiffs and others in similar situations a minimum of four hours pay on days when they were contracted for work, but not used for a minimum of four hours as required by Illinois law. That prevented the workers from looking for other jobs.

“I only get paid minimum wage and yet Labor Ready and Wal-Mart still try to cheat me by not paying me for the time I actually work,” said Twanda Burk, the primary plaintiff on the lawsuit. “I’ve proven that I’m a good worker, and they just want to take advantage of that.”

According to information provided by the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union in a press release promoting the legal action, the alleged violations began in early 2009 and continue up until the present time.

The suit seeks all unpaid wages for the workers and calls for an injunction against Wal-Mart and its temporary agencies preventing them from future violations of state labour laws.

Dan Fogleman, a Wal-Mart spokesman, said that the company is still reviewing the complaint but that based on the release sent out Monday by the union group one thing is clear: “This litigation is being driven by the same union organisations that have been mischaracterising several issues about Wal-Mart and are more concerned with creating publicity than with improving workers’ rights.”

He continued, “We are committed to ensuring that anyone working in our stores — whether they’re employed by Wal-Mart or in this case, a temporary staffing agency — is treated appropriately and compensated fairly for every hour they work.”

Diane Gadzalinski, QPS’s director of human resources, said she is currently reviewing the matter. Labor Ready didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

The suit comes just after Wal-Mart faced a worker walkout earlier this month ahead of its annual investor meeting that expanded to about dozen states. Still, the number of employees involved was less than 200, according to union officials. That’s a tiny fraction of Wal-Mart’s US workforce of 1.3 million workers at its namesake division. A group called Organisation United for Respect at Walmart, or OUR Walmart, organised the walkouts. The organisation, which is made up of current and former Wal-Mart workers, is backed by the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union.

OUR Walmart, which is pressing for better working conditions, is organising a group of Wal-Mart workers to walk out from their jobs on the day after Thanksgiving, the busiest day of the year.

Shares of Wal-Mart ended regular trading up three cents at $75.65 Monday, close to the top of its 52-week range of $55.68 and $77.60. Shares have risen 26 per cent since the beginning of the year amid a rebounding business in its US namesake division.






1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed:

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email:

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

comments powered by Disqus


Do you think an increase in JUTC bus fares is justified at this time?

View Results »


Today's Cartoon

Click image to view full size editorial cartoon