|


YouTube™ Channel
RSS Feeds twitter™

Business

US trade deficit narrows

BY VERONICA SMITH

Friday, March 12, 2010



THE US trade deficit narrowed unexpectedly in January as imports and exports declined and overall volume fell for the first time in five months, the government reported Thursday.

The Commerce Department said the trade deficit shrank to a seasonally adjusted US$37.3 billion, from US$39.9 billion dollars in December, revised lower from US$40.2 billion.

The January deficit surprised most analysts who had expected the trade shortfall would increase to US$41.0 billion .

"The recent roller-coaster ride in trade news continues with this month's release, though the overall trend of slowly growing trade volume continues," said Christopher Cornell at Moody's Economy.com.

Imports dropped 1.7 per cent to US180.0 billion, including the lowest level of oil imports in more than a decade, while exports slipped 0.3 per cent to US$142.7 billion.

"Imports rose at a slower pace versus exports, which shows potentially slower economic activity," Briefing.com analysts said in a client note.

Natixis analyst Inna Mufteeva agreed the data clouded the outlook for the country's fragile recovery from severe recession.

"Apart from the fact of the deficit tightening, there is not much to cheer about in today's report as both imports and exports decreased after several consecutive months of rises," Mufteeva said.

"Indeed, improvement in US consumption did not impress much the importers as consumer goods imports dropped 2.3 per cent in January," she added.

Consumer spending accounts for two-thirds of US economic activity and is considered key to sustainable growth in a budding recovery that so far has been propped up by government spending.

US trade volume with the rest of the world declined for the first time since August, by 1.1 per cent from December, the data showed.

"We are inclined to view it as a seasonal adjustment or weather story, or both, and we expect trade flows to rebound strongly in February," said Ian Shepherdson at High Frequency Economics.

The lower January deficit was partly due to crude oil imports, which slumped to their lowest level since February 1999, at 245 million barrels.

The trade gap in petroleum products, however, again weighed heavily on the trade balance, though the deficit narrowed to US$22.7 billion in January from US$23.6 billion the previous month.

The average price of imported oil jumped to 73.89 dollars, its highest peak since October 2008.

In unadjusted data, the trade deficit with Canada, the largest US trading partner, grew to 3.9 billion dollars, marking the biggest gap since October 2008.

The deficit with Mexico narrowed to US$4.6 billion from US$5.2 billion .

The politically sensitive trade deficit with China barely budged, rising to US$18.3 billion from US$18.1 billion in December.

"Do not expect the situation to last," warned Moody's Cornell, after China reported February trade data Wednesday showing exports soared for the third straight month and at their fastest pace in three years.

"These will be reflected in the US trade data for February, set for release next month," he said.

The country's massive trade gap with China, by far its largest with any trading partner, is an underlying source of friction in bilateral trade ties.

Critics and some lawmakers accuse Beijing of keeping its yuan currency undervalued to maintain a trade advantage.

The US trade deficit narrowed to May lows with two other major trading partners: to US$3.3 billion with Japan and US$2.8 billion with the European Union.


POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha 0a8d47846bcc4891a8587e73341ff7c2
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (0)

AGI's share value could be listed below its capital base

  0 comments

 

Jamaica needs many more Barclay Ewarts to drive a manufacturing renaissance

  0 comments

 

'Thief racked up a $380,000 bill on my credit card'

  0 comments

 

Last house standing

  0 comments

 

Mission Possible

  0 comments

 

Erica Wynter: Helping small businesses deal with the paperwork

  0 comments

 

'Get dressed up and corporate mingle'

  0 comments

 

Cargo airline expands operations from Miami to Montego Bay

  0 comments

 

POLLS: Did you watch the Super Bowl?

  0 comments

 

US on pace for US$1T deficit despite January dip

  0 comments

 

Greek PM says default would lead to 'chaos'

  0 comments

 

...Trade deficit widens

  0 comments

 

Key events in the history of Eastman Kodak

  0 comments

 

Spurring growth in the C'bbean

  0 comments

 

Columbus Communications makes multibillion-dollar telecoms investment in the region

  0 comments

 

Finance Minister Phillips' very difficult task

  4 comments

 

Jamaicansmusic.com goes global

  0 comments

 

Jamaican homeowners facing serious troubles

  0 comments

 

How safe is the air you breathe, the surface you touch and the food you eat?

  0 comments

 

Airlift still high on regional agenda

  0 comments

 

Today's Cartoon


Poll

Did you watch American football's Super Bowl on Sunday? 
Yes, but just for the advertisements
Yes, just for the game itself
Yes, for both the game and advertisements
No, I did not watch the Super Bowl.

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: