Career & Education

Is 'irregardless' a word?

Sunday, October 15, 2017

Print this page Email A Friend!

Having heard this word one too many times, even from people we thought should have been better informed, we sought guidance from the holy grail — the Concise Oxford English Dictionary.

While, to our our dismay, it does list 'irregardless', it describes it as informal, and incorrect in standard English.

This, because of the double negative of the prefix 'ir-' and the suffix '-less'. The former means “not” and the latter means “without”, the resulting translation being “not without regard”.

This, of course, is the opposite of what people generally intend to convey when using the term.

The term is used to mean the same as regardless, the Oxford says, but “the prefix 'ir-' is unnecessary as it merely duplicates the suffix '-less'”.

Also according to the Oxford, 'irregardless' is perhaps a blend of 'irrespective' and 'regardless' and is thought to have orginated in the 20th century.

Other dictionaries have omitted the word altogether.




1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper � email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed:

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email:

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

comments powered by Disqus



Today's Cartoon

Click image to view full size editorial cartoon