|

Columns

Accessible education and politics

Michael Burke

Thursday, January 19, 2012



Opposition leader Andrew Holness says that he would like to see the government continue free education. The new education minister Deacon Ronnie Thwaites is reported to have said that in his own opinion, anyone who can afford to pay fees should pay. There was also a news report that the Jamaica Teachers' Association plans to resist any attempt at stopping free education.

On the one hand, I believe in accessible education, and free tuition should be the ideal. On the other hand, school principals and bursars have complained about not having sufficient maintenance funds because of free education.

It was Norman Washington Manley who began the process of free education with the Common Entrance Examination of 1957. This was when Jamaica Labour Party politicians told the voters, "Saltfish is better than education." At the same time, many of the elite who were of the opinion that high school education should be only for the privileged drew further away from Norman Manley and the People's National Party.

The Jamaica Labour Party came to power in 1962. With the help of a World Bank loan, the JLP government was able to build all over the island what were then called junior secondary schools. Today they are all called high schools.

It was Michael Manley who announced on May 2, 1973 that as of September that year the government would be "embarking upon a system of free education in Jamaica". Free education, as announced by Michael Manley, extended to the Jamaican students at the University of the West Indies and to all tertiary institutions owned by the government.

Once again the privileged thought that this was a sign that the class system to which they believed they had a divine right was collapsing. The PNP was pilloried as a party of mismanagement and hair-brained schemes, and it was argued that Jamaica could not afford free education.

It was Edward Seaga as prime minister and minister of finance in the JLP government of the 1980s who introduced the education tax. He also introduced the cess at the University of the West Indies. At the time, meetings were held with university students and they were told that it was the responsible thing to do and many UWI students agreed.

At the time, Wilmot Perkins stated on radio his firm belief that students should pay for their education and had some multi-syllable words to describe Michael Manley for instituting totally free education in the first place.

When Michael Manley led the PNP back to power in 1989, Wilmot Perkins, who then hosted Hotline, questioned Manley on RJR. Perkins asked Michael Manley if he would be reintroducing free education at the university level and continuing with free education at the secondary level as he had done in 1973. Manley said that there was new thinking on the matter and those who could pay should do so and not be a burden on the budget and the economy.

Later in the 1990s the PNP government introduced cost-sharing in education while Burchell Whiteman was minister of education. At the beginning of each term Whiteman and later his successor Maxine Henry-Wilson reminded school principals on radio at the start of every term that no student should be turned away because they did not pay fees.

In other words, education remained free and accessible at the primary and secondary levels as it had been from 1973 even through so-called cost-sharing. In the JLP's election manifesto of 2002, mention was made of the re-introduction of free education. The JLP lost the election in 2002 as the PNP won four consecutive terms. But was this the same JLP that initially said that salt fish was better than education in the 1950s and said in the 1970s that free education was an act of gross mismanagement?

Was this the same JLP that would later boast, through Audley Shaw in the election debates of December 2011, that the JLP introduced free education? Is it the leader of the JLP who today is issuing a warning to a PNP government not to turn back free education? Ever since the days of PJ Patterson as PNP president and prime minister, the tendency of the PNP has been not to answer verbal attacks during election time if they know that they have the winning formula to be elected to power.

But my major concern is that uncorrected falsehoods lead to an inaccurate way of conveying history. Students should be taught the role of national hero, Norman Manley, in initiating accessible high school education.

This year 2012 is the 75th anniversary of Jamaica Welfare, founded by Norman Manley in 1937. One aspect of Jamaica Welfare was the Adult Literacy Programme with its theme, "Each one teach one". It was later broadened by Michael Manley and called the Jamaican Movement for the Advancement of Literacy (JAMAL).

In this the year of the 50th jubilee of Jamaica's political independence, let us make an effort to teach our young people the truth of Jamaica's history and not some exaggerations fabricated for political purposes.

ekrubm765@yahoo.com



POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha 2fcdcea383b44057bb360f3a063c3610
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (6)

Fabian Williams
1/21/2012
manley was irresponsible in introducing free teritary education when he did and both JLP and non JLP agreed it was a wrong decision and properly thought out. All political parties change policies overtime. Manley opposed privatisation but when in govt. sold majority stake in TOJ to Cable and Wireless. Marc Rich was bad for Jamaica but when in govt the PNP considered him a good man to do business with. You need to stop playing the role of PNP historian
Fabian Williams
1/21/2012
Another disappointing piece by Burke. He is very deceptive in not highlighting certain facts on education.Sir for your information the University students opposed the cess and in this regard we were guided by members of the PNP and WPJ. I can list names if you would like me to. Manley promised to remove cess but soon after coming to power nothing more was said about it. It was merely an election ploy because it was said Seaga did not want blacks to hve access to education hence the cess.
diehardr sickheads
1/19/2012
andrew might have contrubuted but this problem did not start in 2007 shift schools,poor parenting,poor early childhood, .I am surprise that the jta was blaming the jlp for the shift schools that was started with good motives by micheal manley.
Simon Simple
1/19/2012
Andrew Holness has truly personified the reason why experience usually has the edge over age. In his quest for power he has sacrificed his own true feelings (that's giving him the benefit of the doubt), and would clutch at the proverbial straw to gain Leadership on a National level.
Caleb Barrett
1/19/2012
This is a very important article full of crucial information. I hope people pay attention. The JLP is playing games with the future of the children. Their removal of cost-sharing means less funds go to the schools, so the children are getting an education, but not a good one. They are hurting the poor by selling "gyow".
kadian alexander
1/19/2012
well said !!!

As your bishop...

  0 comments

 

Credit unions and crisis leadership

  0 comments

 

No such person as a good don

  11 comments

 

Crosskill's departure from TVJ marks end of an era

  5 comments

 

Issues to consider during Child Month

  0 comments

 

'Compassion without Compromise': Church throws down the gauntlet

  23 comments

 

Gloria Palomino: A lifetime of voluntary service to the police

  0 comments

 

Fast fall in a slow system

  2 comments

 

Parents have ultimate responsibility for their children

  5 comments

 

IOP ball back in Omar's court

  0 comments

 

Needed: a collective voice in the G20 for developing countries

  0 comments

 

No growth without social cohesion

  0 comments

 

Let's get our priorities right

  1 comments

 

A high price to pay for physical perfection

  0 comments

 

Don't go there, Ronnie

  0 comments

 

A time to deal with the CAL/Liat conflict

  0 comments

 

Greece gets another chance to tackle its fiscal dilemma

  0 comments

 

Time for a revolution in education

  1 comments

 

Obama: President, not Pastor of America

  15 comments

 

Taxi drivers and a clean Kingston Harbour

  4 comments

 

Today's Cartoon


Poll

 Do you feel buying into Facebook now is a good investment for the long-run? 
Yes
No

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: