|

Columns

An act of disrespect

Tuesday, February 26, 2013



Dear Editor,

I would just like to speak on a burning issue. I find the Saturn commercial to be in poor taste. It is very disrespectful that our flag should be burnt and stomped on for a commercial (computer graphics or not).

However, there are certain tragic truths that we as a people should look at in analysing this situation. In the first instance, we must acknowledge that this commercial could have been produced using just about any flag on earth. Additionally, we must also consider that the commercial could have been made using a fictitious country and it would have yielded the same result. Unfortunately, this is not the case.

I firmly believe that it is no coincidence that this comes closely on the back of the VW commercial, which yielded a lot of attention in international media, particularly because of the contention created thereafter. Therefore, it must be a specific act of disrespect, hoping to bring a lot of attention to Saturn. I, for one, have never heard of the company before this commercial and I am certain that the intended publicity was received. The intention is not to produce a funny commercial; certainly that produces a soothing effect to some. No, the intention is to offend, and by offending, bring about unearned attention.

We can take two approaches, ask for an apology and get on with life when they say sorry - as they probably will without our request in any event (There's the old saying, "It's easier to say sorry than it is to say please"); or alternately, we may take them to court and sue them for use of our intellectual property without our permission. We can bear in mind that the Jamaican flag is our trademark and this has been established through use, whether or not it has been registered.

The doctor is searching for money, he could incorporate this. We should make a statement that this fire will not be a cool breeze behind their tails.

Robert Howell

roberthowelljm@yahoo.com



POST A COMMENT

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy



comments powered by Disqus

Yes to trade and aid: What of rule of law?

 

Food for the Poor — love that lifts

 

The new world — secrecy and digital tyranny

 

The urgency of getting the education debate on track

 

No need for a trade war between Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago

 

If you intend to stay in the UK illegally, think twice

 

The mission to improve West Rural St Andrew

 

Say it ain't so

 

Honour teachers, don't begrudge them

 

Best of whose times, the worst of which times

 

Stand firm, Thwaites, the IMF deal depends on it

 

A life of service

 

Sports journalists as targets

 

Is civil society becoming extinct?

 

Lest we forget the night of February 26, 2012

 

Why is manufacturing not part of IMF growth agenda?

 

Solutions to Jamaica's transient education system

 

Why we are glad... and mad!

 

Chinese eggs waiting to be hatched

 

The Whitfields vs the Dixons

 

Today's Cartoon