|

Columns

Dan Marino and his love child

Tuesday, February 12, 2013



Dear Editor,

The bigger they are, the harder they fall. I disagree with those who believe celebrity football star Dan Marino should not receive a backlash from the media for his part in fathering a love child back in 2005.

As with any celebrity, the price they pay for their faux pas should be commensurate with the fame they have achieved. Dan Marino may have never claimed to be above other people, but he also never shied away from all the trappings that come with being a big sports star. He collected hefty pay cheques for lame endorsements of products like Papa John's Pizza, Hooters, Maroone Automobiles, AARP, FirstPlus Mortgage, Isotoner Gloves and Levinson Jewelers, to name but a few. He also parlayed his football career into an acting career making appearances in movies like Little Nicky, Holy Man, Bad Boys II and Ace Ventura: Pet Detective. In addition, Marino was known to charge as much as US$50,000-US$100,000 for various appearances, motivational speaking engagements and autograph signings.

Yet Marino, while publically endorsing himself and touting his so-called "leadership skills" to the world, was using his money to hide the fact that he was secretly engaging in non-leadership, sexual infidelities. And now that he has been found out, he wants all the bad publicity to go away so that he can continue on just as before — keeping his "arrangement private to protect all parties involved". Is such a phony truly beyond our moral reproach? Is he really beyond public scrutiny? I think not. Celebrities who want it all should be ready to take the fall.

Paul Kokoski

Ontario, Canada



POST A COMMENT

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy



comments powered by Disqus

'Where are the fathers' loving arms?

 

Do we still have patriotic Jamaicans?

 

Yes to trade and aid: What of rule of law?

 

Food for the Poor — love that lifts

 

The new world — secrecy and digital tyranny

 

The urgency of getting the education debate on track

 

No need for a trade war between Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago

 

If you intend to stay in the UK illegally, think twice

 

The mission to improve West Rural St Andrew

 

Say it ain't so

 

Honour teachers, don't begrudge them

 

Best of whose times, the worst of which times

 

Stand firm, Thwaites, the IMF deal depends on it

 

A life of service

 

Sports journalists as targets

 

Is civil society becoming extinct?

 

Lest we forget the night of February 26, 2012

 

Why is manufacturing not part of IMF growth agenda?

 

Solutions to Jamaica's transient education system

 

Why we are glad... and mad!

 

Today's Cartoon