|

Columns

It's bigotry if church discriminates against homosexuals

Monday, January 30, 2012



Dear Editor,

As a devout churchman I fail to appreciate the concern that many of my church folk have about the buggery law. The practice of faith, the last time I checked in my church, was based on the teachings of the Bible, not on the legislature. The church does not need the support of the state in order to practise its beliefs. If it does, then we must worry. But what would be the legal implications if the buggery laws were repealed in Jamaica?

It seems to me that it would come down to a question of whether the right to choose one's sexual expression isn't one that can be surrendered to the dictates of a religious body to which one belongs - meaning that one's belief and practice of one's sexual expressions are subjected to the authority of the church. If choosing one's sexuality is an inalienable right, then the church would be practising its belief in violation of the law. But if it is not an inalienable right, then legally the church is within its right to maintain its position that homosexuality is wrong.

I agree with those who are convinced that the issue is not about homosexuality as it is about rights, which is a discussion that must take place well beyond the parameters of one's sexual orientation. God made man with the power of choice, and unless in the exercise - in particular instances - infringes on another's right, then those choices should be between God and the individuals.

Granted, as God's servants whose understanding would place the burden on us to appeal to those who are leading an objectionable lifestyle, we are obliged to publish our beliefs - not in a manner as to condemn, but to persuade those we are concerned about that it would be in their best interest to follow God's recommended way to live. And we do this with the full knowledge that there is an extensive list of unholy practices that would separate us from God. We therefore do not discriminate against homosexuals. That would be bigotry.

I would take exception to any individual or group who would, without the support of scripture, want to redefine the belief system of my church. With the many religious options there are in the world today, among which are sympathisers to the homosexual way of life, coupled with the fact that church membership is not an inalienable right, why would an individual or a group want to take a church to court? If it were me, I would find one where I am accepted, or create my own. You need your space to live as you believe, please allow me mine. But if you won't, the Bible rules.

Charles Evans

charock01@yahoo.com



POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha 8c09f12b0cdf4e3ebd6591a1ee9e7ed9
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (5)

pete delisser
1/31/2012
I can only say one word to this well written article: AMEN!!
Meat Head
1/30/2012
Within broad limits, a church does have the right to set membership requirements based on its beliefs, or superstitions. The problem arises when we allow these superstitions to be extended outside the church. And gays are not the only ones harmed; all of us suffer. From the examples of the Asian Tigers, it should be clear by now that in an increasingly technological world, economic progress is incompatible with bronze-age superstitions.
Ramon Castro
1/30/2012
I have never heard of any church or religion that condemn homosexuality. Churches that I am familiar with always pray fro homosexuals. There is a difference between condemning gays and condemning SEX between two men or two women. Churches don't condemn people who practice sex outside of marriage, they condemn fornication. Churches don't condemn an unfaithful husband or wife, they condemn adultery. The mandate of the church is to speak out against SIN (the church's definition base on the Bible)
Donny S
1/30/2012
2/2 There are other things besides homosexuality that are wrong. Things such as murder, adultery, and stealing in any form are examples and I don't hear of them being talked about as much as homosexuality is. What somoene does in the privacy of his or her bedroom is none of our business. Someone's way of life as long as it's not thrown in our faces is also none of our business.
I think homosexuality is gross but I'm not going to force my feelings and views on anyone.
Donny S
1/30/2012
Well written article! You know I'm amazed at how we throw God's name around as an excuse to hate and discrimination. Sadly, the church, who loves to proclaim its morals and beliefs to non-church goers is smack-dab in the middle of it. I would have thought that the church would be the first to jump up and scream against discrimination in any form which includes homosexuality. That's a huge double-standard. 1/2

Plenty money... little sense

  0 comments

 

Usain is our Othello — Love, sex, power and racism

  0 comments

 

As your bishop...

  0 comments

 

Credit unions and crisis leadership

  0 comments

 

No such person as a good don

  11 comments

 

Crosskill's departure from TVJ marks end of an era

  5 comments

 

Issues to consider during Child Month

  0 comments

 

'Compassion without Compromise': Church throws down the gauntlet

  23 comments

 

Gloria Palomino: A lifetime of voluntary service to the police

  0 comments

 

Fast fall in a slow system

  2 comments

 

Parents have ultimate responsibility for their children

  5 comments

 

IOP ball back in Omar's court

  0 comments

 

Needed: a collective voice in the G20 for developing countries

  0 comments

 

No growth without social cohesion

  0 comments

 

Let's get our priorities right

  1 comments

 

A high price to pay for physical perfection

  0 comments

 

Don't go there, Ronnie

  0 comments

 

A time to deal with the CAL/Liat conflict

  0 comments

 

Greece gets another chance to tackle its fiscal dilemma

  0 comments

 

Time for a revolution in education

  1 comments

 

Today's Cartoon


Poll

 Do you feel buying into Facebook now is a good investment for the long-run? 
Yes
No

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: