Hear the Children's Cry condemns treatment of Mona student 3:15 PM
Health of Jamaica's children improving — Ferguson 2:58 PM
Cops looking for Jody-Ann McNarrin 2:21 PM
'Ratty' killed in motor vehicle accident 2:05 PM
Woman left lying in her own urine in jail before she died 1:15 PM
Emergency repair work disrupts water supply in St James 1:12 PM
UN: Budget cuts causing cholera deaths in Haiti 11:35 AM
Modest growth for Caribbean countries in 2012 11:32 AM
Busy denied bail 10:59 AM
Man detained over New York boy's 1979 disappearance 10:43 AM
Columns
PM needs to stop scoring own goals
CLAUDE ROBINSON
Sunday, June 26, 2011
PRIME Minister Bruce Golding and the ruling Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) have a way of shooting themselves in the head. One of these days they will score a direct hit, not just the superficial wounds they have inflicted so far.
The observation was inspired by Mr Golding's bird-shooting vacation with contractor YP Seaton which, at best, was another display of terribly bad timing and poor political judgement by the JLP leader.
A day after tabling the report of the Dudus/Manatt Commission of Enquiry in Parliament Mr Golding went off on a one-week vacation to Paraguay with Mr Seaton and other friends for what the country was later told was a regular bird-shooting exercise -- a pastime not uncommon among some upper-income, high-status Jamaican men.
At the time of the announcement, the country was not told that the prime minister would be paying for himself and his son. That was later revealed by Information Minister Daryl Vaz only after a political controversy over allegations that the trip was financed by Mr Seaton. The minister even showed reporters a copy of the cheque for $730,000 drawn by Mr Golding on his personal account.
The payment date on the cheque is June 14, five days before the matter was brought to light in a newspaper article, so it is fair and logical to conclude that the cheque was a legitimate reimbursement of expenses and not an 'afterthought' to dampen down the controversy and squelch calls for an official probe.
Accordingly, I accept Mr Golding's word that he paid his own way and that the vacation package was not a gift from a large contractor who has benefited hugely from government contracts. However, there are troubling questions which will not disappear merely by revealing details of the financial arrangement.
First, the prime minister and his handlers should have been aware that the arrangement would have generated negative perceptions at a time of deep public disquiet over the handling of government contracts, especially the US$400-million Jamaica Development Infrastructure Project (JDIP) financed by a Chinese Government loan and administered by China Harbour, a Chinese construction company. Mr Seaton and his construction company, YP Seaton and Associates Ltd, are the sub-contractors on the project.
Further, data released last week by Contractor General Greg Christie show that YP Seaton and Associates have won 35 government contracts totalling $2.7 billion between May 2001 and November 2010. Seventeen of the contracts, amounting to as much as $2.3 billion of the overall sum of $2.7 billion, were entered into since October 1, 2007, that is, since the Golding administration took office.
Ignorance or arrogance?
Why did Mr Golding and his advisers not see the controversy coming and take the necessary pre-emptive measures to avert it? Why didn't they foresee that a vacation with one of the largest beneficiaries of government contracts and the JDIP would raise questions? Was it not the same prime minister who, just a week earlier, had to announce that he would appoint an independent expert to oversee expenditure under JDIP in the face of high costs and questionable value?
At the post-Cabinet media briefing last Wednesday, Mr Vaz reportedly took "full responsibility" for how the prime minister's vacation arrangements had been handled, conceding that he would not use the same approach in the future.
At issue now is whether the wrong approach was used because of ignorance of the fundamentals of political communication in the age of transparency or whether it betrayed a mindset that is not sufficiently caring of public perception. Was it a display of arrogance and the corrosive influence of power?
The mishandling of the vacation arrangement also suggests that Mr Golding and the team around him have learned nothing from the Manatt mess, or they are drawing the wrong conclusions from the mild rebuke they got from the commissioners.
It would be unwise of them to be lulled into a false comfort zone merely because the high-level political leaders in the administration and the JLP have been largely vindicated by a spineless commission who ignored the evidence and misrepresentations presented to them and concluded that no one should be held accountable for what the commissioners described as "inappropriate" or "unfortunate" behaviour.
Mr Emil George and his fellow commissioners obligingly shied away from the really fundamental question they should have addressed: Did the prime minister, directly or indirectly, corrupt agencies of the State in furtherance of the narrow interest of his party and in defence of a reputed don in his constituency?
Instead, they made determinations about constitutional matters that properly belong to the courts, and they offered irrelevant recommendations about separating the Ministry of Justice from the chambers of the attorney general. That was not on their 'to do' list.
But rather than taking comfort from a friendly and expected outcome, the prime minister should pay attention to the verdict of the people as captured in two polls reported last week.
The Don Anderson/CVM polls (conducted May 5-23 after the hearings but before the report) showed that 47 per cent believed that somebody should be asked to resign for the mishandling of the US request for the extradition of Christopher 'Dudus' Coke. Of these, 61 per cent felt that Mr Golding is the one who should go, while 33 per cent believe that Attorney General and Justice Minister Dorothy Lightbourne should be the one heading for the exit.
In the Bill Johnson/Gleaner poll, conducted May 28-29 and June 4-5, some 60 per cent of adult Jamaicans felt that Mr Golding in his evidence either lied outright or attempted to mislead the commission. He was only slightly better than Miss Lightbourne, as 63 per cent believed that she lied or attempted to mislead.
These are big numbers that cannot be wished away simply because they are not accompanied by street protests. As an experienced politician, Mr Golding knows that the proverbial 800-pound Manatt gorilla is still in the room.
Civil society and business groups, including Jamaicans For Justice and the Jamaica Chamber of Commerce, last week joined the chorus of individuals and organisations criticising the commissioners for being weak, inconclusive and illogical. Also, the Opposition People's National Party (PNP) has served notice in Parliament that it wants a debate on the report. The Government will be hard pressed to deny it the opportunity.
In these circumstances, the prime minister must show that he understands that people do not want the same old governance where leaders do not feel a need to be held accountable.
At one level, this means pursuing the agenda of reform that Mr Golding outlined at the height of public disquiet over the Coke affair. Civil society demands for greater accountability will intensify after Manatt, not lessen. And the pressure must be on the PNP as well.
Without such accountability, the prime minister's other major agenda items -- tax reform, reform of the public service and economic revival -- have no chance of succeeding. Accountability in government is job one. Absent this, the result is that more people will continue to lose faith in politics.
To focus on these issues, Mr Golding should stop inflicting wounds on himself; or, to use his own metaphor, he must stop scoring own goals. That's a sure way to lose.
kcr@cwjamaica.com
POST A COMMENT
You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.
HOUSE RULES
1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.
2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.
3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.
4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.
5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.
6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.
7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.
6/27/2011
Ordinary Jamaicans trying to have a life are fed up of both political crime organisations. They both pretended impotence in the face of rampant serial killers of all stripes in the society. Why do we persist in praising one side or the other? We do not owe Golding for the drop in murders. It is the USA that threw the gauntlet down, and when the serial killers picked it up, 'BG' had no choice.
Hubris and arrogance! These false leaders don't love us! They only seek to use and abuse us.
6/26/2011
I don't have the time for you Tom Stroke. All I would ask though is that how many people died in whatever YOU might choose to mention and how much did it cost the country both in terms of money or what the world thinks of us. And also measure 18-1/2 years as against 4 years.
Better yet read today's Gleaner about people's perception of both parties and corruption.
That is all the time I have for you today and maybe ever. My time is much too valuable than to spen it sparring with YOU.
6/26/2011
Good insight Fall Mouth.Jamaicans have been giving it's leaders ample notice and chances to just govern evenly for it's citizens. They choose to ignore said warning not only at their peril but ours, because not everyone can "fly out". They probably know it as well, an editorial of this papers competition stated that the upper gentry of this nation keeps their money in Florida and despite numerous incentives refuse to invest in their country of birth. We know fully well why they choose not to.
6/26/2011
THIS STORY CONFIRMS WHICH MEDIA HOUSE IS FOR THE PM.
6/26/2011
@fall mouth, or a cheque to show how much was paid to PNP dons not to protest in 2005, according to the wiki document. Do you want us to continue this all day?
6/26/2011
Tom Stroke, or perhaps a cheque for who paid Manatt on behalf of Dudus?
6/26/2011
I will not argue that Mr Golding need to be extra careful in his conduct to avoid misconceptions. But, trying to imply that he should never be seen in the company of one of his old friend is just ludicrous. For bird-shooting is a venture that one have to be very careful of the the people they attend such an event with. Otherwise, one can be shot and things made to look like an accident. For transparency, can we also be provided with a cheque to show repayment to Trafigura?
6/26/2011
Why does Mr. Robinson accept that the check was a legitimate reimbursement... just because of the date? Doesn't it require some further investigation? It may have emerged that the newspaper, a weekly, was working on the story. Wouldn't the real test be whether the parties can show payments for previous years? C'mon Mr. Robinson! We expect better from you. Better analysis and better investigation!
6/26/2011
BG is does these things because he knows he will get away with them. Had a P.J. Patterson or a Portia Simpson-Miller done what he did then the media would have been screaming bloody murder until election day.
As it is it took a weekly cash-strapped publication to break the story .
Look at Trafigura which was obviously money given to the PNP to fund its election. To date we have not heard any curiosity from the media as to where the JLP got their funds from although they outspent the PNP 5:1.
Other Stories
0 comments
Usain is our Othello — Love, sex, power and racism
0 comments
0 comments
Credit unions and crisis leadership
0 comments
11 comments
Crosskill's departure from TVJ marks end of an era
5 comments
Issues to consider during Child Month
0 comments
'Compassion without Compromise': Church throws down the gauntlet
23 comments
Gloria Palomino: A lifetime of voluntary service to the police
0 comments
2 comments
Parents have ultimate responsibility for their children
5 comments
0 comments
Needed: a collective voice in the G20 for developing countries
0 comments
No growth without social cohesion
0 comments
Let's get our priorities right
1 comments
A high price to pay for physical perfection
0 comments
0 comments
A time to deal with the CAL/Liat conflict
0 comments
Greece gets another chance to tackle its fiscal dilemma
0 comments
Time for a revolution in education
1 comments





