Columns
Should doctors warn against MSM?
Thursday, September 09, 2010
Dear Editor,
On August 30, 2010, Science News published the article, "UN climate panel urged to reform, stick to science" by Louis Charbonneau. The recommendations were made by a group of scientists, under the chairmanship of Princeton University Professor Harold Shapiro. They were reviewing the work of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The IPCC had been widely criticised for wrongly predicting Himalayan glaciers would vanish by 2035 and overstating how much of the Netherlands is below sea level. The reviewing committee insisted that such firm forecasts should be made "only when there is sufficient evidence".
Could the UN be accused of placing advocacy before science in other areas?
UNAIDS Executive Director Michel Sidibe, speaking at the "Congressional Briefing on HIV, Human Rights and Men who have sex with men" on September 16, 2009, blamed
"homophobia, prejudice, stigma and discrimination" for MSM's lack of universal access to appropriate care for HIV/AIDS and thus the high prevalence of HIV in this group. "These statistics from Asia, Latin America and Africa continue to shock and enrage me," he said, "but I find it even more perplexing that the situation is not so different here in the US." Mr Sidibe welcomed India's repeal of the penal code against sodomy as a "historic victory".
Why is Mr Sidibe perplexed about the US statistics?
Data from the Centres for Disease Control, Eurosurveillance and other sources indicate that since 2000, in both resource-rich and resource-poor countries with or without legalisation of homosexuality, HIV/AIDS epidemics among men who have sex with men have been advancing.
For example, S Le Vu S et al "Population-based HIV incidence in France, 2003 to 2008. Seventeenth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, abstract 36LB, San Francisco, 2010" reported that the HIV incidence among gay men in France is 59 times the incidence of the general population and that the incidence decreased in all groups except gay men between 2003 and 2008. Further, I Jansen et al in "Increasing trend among young men who have sex with men in Amsterdam: a 25-year prospective cohort study. Seventeenth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, abstract 35, San Francisco, 2010" reported that "HIV incidence in gay men has been increasing steadily since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the mid-90s". The report stated that "among gay men aged 30 and under, annual HIV incidence, which had been 0.9 per cent in 1997, increased to 3.8 per cent by July 2009". Homosexuality has been legal in the Netherlands and France since 1811 and 1791 respectively.
Why does HIV continue to present this unique challenge to the male homosexual community? Is advocacy trumping science in framing UN policy for HIV in the homosexual community? Is it possible that the activities of MSM, like cigarette smoking, are inherently bad for one's health? Should medical authorities issue a warning similar to that against cigarette smoking on the activities of MSM?
W West
wayne_west@hotmail.com
POST A COMMENT
You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.
HOUSE RULES
1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.
2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.
3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.
4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.
5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.
6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.
7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.
9/11/2010
How shameful it is that the Jamaica Observer would give space to such a homophobic viewpoint. If the write had espoused racist views would JO have subjected its readers to such garbage? Homophobic views are deemed fit to print for one reason only - homophobia is still acceptable on the island of Jamaica. MSM will only become less vulnerable when attitudes towards MSM change. The JO might want to start by changing its own attitude towards this subject.
9/10/2010
This is precisely the kind of twisted logic that misleads readers in a destructive way. There are 33 million people living with HIV in the world today. The majority are heterosexuals having acquired the virus through sexual intercourse. By M West's logic, should doctors be warning against heterosexuals as their activities are inherently dangerous? Further, Michel Sidibe talked of stigma/discrimination - which are not overcome simply because a change in laws. They require changed attitudes.
Other Stories
The iconoclastic Wilmot Perkins
0 comments
0 comments
Riverton fire: Spontaneous combustion or arson?
12 comments
0 comments
1 comments
Barclay Ewart: A champion of Champs
0 comments
Rethinking the approach to crime and development
0 comments
0 comments
Human sexuality and the buggery law
0 comments
0 comments
Troubling decision by a Haitian judge for Caricom
0 comments
Ready or not, a newer world emerges
6 comments
'My whole life ... shall be devoted to your service'
0 comments
4 comments
By his boards we know a minister
0 comments
Getting JEEP out of the showroom
18 comments
1 comments
Secularism engulfing the Western Hemisphere
13 comments
Kay Osborne ends her glorious TVJ innings
6 comments
0 comments




