|
YouTube™ Channel
RSS Feeds twitter™

Columns

Triad — the indomitable fortification

ANTHONY GOMES

Wednesday, September 08, 2010



Sixty-five years ago in August 1945 the world changed the course of its destiny with the arrival of the nuclear age. The spectacular historic entrance of atomic power was demonstrated when the first ever atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, followed by a second nuclear bomb dropped three days later on Nagasaki on August 9, 1945, which ended the Second World War.

The awesome energy of nuclear power was revealed for the first time in the belief that with the end of the most horrific war in the history of the human race, a world at peace with nuclear power would become a much-improved environment for mankind to prosper and enjoy. Sixty-five years on, can we honestly agree the condition of the world's citizens and the hard won new age values and attitudes have fundamentally improved? A large segment of world opinion disagrees with that view.

In relative terms, world peace was short-lived with the outbreak of sectoral wars in Korea, Viet Nam, Malaya, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan, and plagued with the spread of insurrections from Kathmandu to Jamaica. These violent upheavals seriously devalued the personal security of individuals throughout the world, who now cower behind bars, while paying heightened attention to maintaining a safe and peaceful existence.

The Geneva Convention, which governs the practice of humane warfare and the treatment of prisoners of war, went out the window with the rise of unconventional terrorist warfare, practised with blatant acts of barbarism and a merciless attitude towards unarmed civilians and children. A worldwide terrorist network has evolved with the birth of Al Qaeda that has the capability to strike even in the most well-protected areas, and within densely populated cities, as seen regularly in Iraq and Pakistan with suicide attacks claiming hundreds of lives.

This brings us to the "razor's edge" of nuclear confrontation being provoked by Iran and North Korea. With each act of provocation, the world moves closer to a military engagement with these two rogue states termed "the axis of evil" by former US President George W Bush.

Iran's latest incitement is launching a drone aircraft capable of delivering a bomb. The aircraft appears to be similar to the flying "buzz" bombs which rained down on London during the Battle of Britain.The exact range is unknown but is very likely to include Israeli territory. This latest weapon comes after the recent exhibition by the Revolutionary Guards of medium- and long-range missiles built to deliver nuclear warheads. The likely conclusion of these spectacular exhibitions of military hardware is that Iran is a country preparing for war. Meanwhile, the UN has approved stronger economic sanctions against Iran that were met as usual with derision by Iran's President Ahmadinejad.

At the other end of this sinister spectrum is North Korea which persists with its nuclear programme, while maintaining its long-standing friendly relationship with China. The US has responded by applying stiffer economic sanctions that include freezing the assets of companies trading in material with DPRK. The continued pursuit of its nuclear programme and the sinking of the South Korean warship have prompted this latest US response.

In his April 2009 speech in Prague, President Obama highlighted 21st century nuclear dangers, declaring that to overcome these "grave and growing" threats the US will "seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons". The language used - "overcome these grave and growing threats" - indicates the extreme seriousness of the violent rhetoric emanating primarily from Iran and North Korea infused with danger from Al Qaeda worldwide.

According to the US April 2010 Nuclear Posture Review Report, focus is on steps to be taken in the next five to 10 years thus: "The threat of global nuclear war has become remote, but the risk of nuclear attack has increased. Concerns have grown in recent years that we are approaching a nuclear tipping point - that unless today's dangerous trends are arrested and reversed, before very long we will be living in a world with a steadily growing number of nuclear-armed states and an increasing likelihood of terrorists getting their hands on nuclear weapons. Forthwith, US strategic forces - comprising submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and nuclear-capable heavy bombers - collectively called the TRIAD, continue to underwrite deterrence of nuclear attack against the US, our allies and partners." Nuclear proliferating states including Iran and North Korea, "must understand that any attack on the US, our allies and partners, will be defeated, and any use of nuclear weapons will be met with a response that would be effective and overwhelming".

The explosive power from the "Little Boy" atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima was equivalent to 20,000 tons of TNT, roughly the same power as "Fat Boy" used against Nagasaki. The 20 kiloton yield appears to be minuscule when compared with today's Hydrogen bomb. Only the US is believed to have thermonuclear technology developed since the end of WWII, that brought the world into the Thermonuclear Age.

The latest outspoken voice to caution against further escalation of Mid-East tension was Fidel Castro in his speech last week, wearing his battle-dress fatigues. He told his audience that the US and Israel would lead the world into an uncontrollable nuclear confrontation with Iran, if a military engagement ensued.

Clearly, more has to be done diplomatically to try to negotiate with Iran and reduce the current threat level. The sooner the better!


POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha b5ff85793ba64d8b963373f70bcfcfd0
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (8)

nervous investor
9/9/2010

Let yesterday's prejudices go. It is not right to say that Iran (or anyone else) should have nuclear weapons because they are not Caucasian - this is plain stupidity. No one should need such weapons BUT some folk (regardless of skin colour or riches) are lethally dangerous to the entire world. Iranians (Persians) have frequently demonstrated warlike tendencies BUT WORSE TODAY they are creeping corrosively into every crevice and their religious leaders believe in Armageddon. Not good.
Peter Lawrence
9/8/2010
The war is already starting. The hint is that Israel is now prepared to appear to hold peace talks on Palestine as it does not want to be fighting on all 3 fronts, Iran, Lebanon (Hezbollah), West bank ,and perhaps Syria. Israel would still win but it would have to kill thousands, if not millions, of Arabs and suffer significant casualties itself. Israel makes fuss at ONE citizen lost & has far better morale being democratic stat; Iran will STONE woman , beat her 99 lashes, as in OT times.
Beresford Davidson
9/8/2010
War war war'O; so, so war'o, so, so war'o
Duncan Bertram
9/8/2010
Obama next to Jesus and we will die for Obama. If north korea and china think they are so powerful, tell them to get Iran and come.
critical thinker
9/8/2010
Quote: [This brings us to the "razor's edge" of nuclear confrontation being provoked by Iran and North Korea.]
The writer is ridiculous, he believes Caucasians should have nuclear weapons while others fight with bow-and-arrows and spears. Amazingly racist. Look how he sides with the powerful against the weak. Facts: Iran has never invaded another country, while North Korea last did this back in 1950 (60 years ago). And USA , UK, France? Well, they invade [a Joel Andem gang quote]: "one-a-day".
P Bogle
9/8/2010
The concept of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), due to nuclear weaponry, ensured that a WW II scale conflict would not be repeated; the risks, even to the winner, were simply too great. Obviously, MAD was not a deterrent to small scale conflicts, which you cite. But these were not particularly important. Like you, I think that if North Korea was foolish enough to launch against the US, it would be destroyed, as would Iran. This certainty will continue to ensure the peace.
Noel Richards
9/8/2010
Jah Afrique,
The US has no desire to attack North Korea. Stability is the name of the game. During the Korean War the US could have destroyed North Korea and China with nuclear weapons, but chose not to do so. There was a stalemate, signified by the 34th Parallel. China has only 1/3 the GDP of the US. 80% of US Government debt is held by Americans. China does not innovate or invent, it steals. China's bubble, built on exports to the US from jobs exported by the US, will soon burst.
Jah Afrique
9/8/2010
Believe it or not, China is the new superpower because she forms an economic and military buffer between the US allies and these two "rogue nations".The way it stands,N.Korea is untouchable now for the same reason she was in the Korean war where the US was sent running when China intervened.China hold the US purse string,and the US attacks N.Korea,the world's financial market will sink to a point worse than a nuclear strike.An attack on Iran will result in unthinkable consequence.

The iconoclastic Wilmot Perkins

  0 comments

 

Legends abound in our Jamaica

  0 comments

 

Riverton fire: Spontaneous combustion or arson?

  12 comments

 

Envisioning the impossible

  0 comments

 

Jamaica is not an island

  1 comments

 

Barclay Ewart: A champion of Champs

  0 comments

 

Rethinking the approach to crime and development

  0 comments

 

Happy birthday

  0 comments

 

Human sexuality and the buggery law

  0 comments

 

Don't cry for Argentina

  0 comments

 

Troubling decision by a Haitian judge for Caricom

  0 comments

 

Ready or not, a newer world emerges

  6 comments

 

'My whole life ... shall be devoted to your service'

  0 comments

 

Straighten up and dress right

  4 comments

 

By his boards we know a minister

  0 comments

 

Getting JEEP out of the showroom

  18 comments

 

Manley, Garveyism and Matalon

  1 comments

 

Secularism engulfing the Western Hemisphere

  13 comments

 

Kay Osborne ends her glorious TVJ innings

  6 comments

 

All that glitters is not gold

  0 comments

 

Today's Cartoon


Poll

Did you watch American football's Super Bowl on Sunday? 
Yes, but just for the advertisements
Yes, just for the game itself
Yes, for both the game and advertisements
No, I did not watch the Super Bowl.

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: