Hear the Children's Cry condemns treatment of Mona student 3:15 PM
Health of Jamaica's children improving — Ferguson 2:58 PM
Cops looking for Jody-Ann McNarrin 2:21 PM
'Ratty' killed in motor vehicle accident 2:05 PM
Woman left lying in her own urine in jail before she died 1:15 PM
Emergency repair work disrupts water supply in St James 1:12 PM
UN: Budget cuts causing cholera deaths in Haiti 11:35 AM
Modest growth for Caribbean countries in 2012 11:32 AM
Busy denied bail 10:59 AM
Man detained over New York boy's 1979 disappearance 10:43 AM
Editorial
Contender scores for boxing again
Saturday, February 18, 2012
THE visual evidence appears to suggest that Mr Courtney Simister, the losing boxer in the opening bout of the Wray & Nephew Contender Boxing Series at the Chinese Benevolent Association on Wednesday night, has a point when he suggests the contest was marred by unpunished technical fouls.
Those of us watching on television would have seen at least one case of sustained rabbit punching (punches to the rear of the neck and upper back) which, in boxing, is illegal and should be penalised.
It's an aspect to which organisers and fight officials will no doubt be paying keen attention going forward. Amidst the dazzle of what is essentially a television production, it is also imperative that the standards of the sport of boxing be upheld.
However, we can't help but suspect that Mr Simister -- who we are told has spent a few years away from the sport -- was below par in terms of fitness and ultimately paid the price. Certainly, he appeared to have no answer to Mr Dwayne Holmes' calculated body assault, resulting in the fight -- which was scheduled for six rounds -- ending in just one.
But while the fight itself may have been anti-climactic for those of us watching, the event once again demonstrated the power of television and its absolute importance to the sustainability of modern sport.
Last year, the inaugural Contender Series, which was then focused on middleweights, captured the imagination of the Jamaican television audience not just with the standard of boxing -- which improved as the competition progressed -- but with the quality of production. In terms of reality television, last year's series was perhaps bested only by the extraordinary Dudus/Manatt Enquiry for sheer popularity.
These are tough times economically, so for brand sponsors Wray & Nephew to be back on board this season suggests a level of satisfaction with the promotional value gained last year.
For the fighters, the biggest incentive is perhaps the promise of exposure, though the cash prizes can by no means be discounted. As we understand it, the eventual winner after seven weeks of competition will carry home $1 million, with second, third and fourth place sharing another million dollars.
Happiest perhaps are the executive members of the Jamaica Boxing Board led by president Mr Stephen Jones. Those of us who are old enough recall the 1950s and '60s when boxing gyms, in Kingston in particular, were abuzz with action -- producing such high quality fighters as Messrs Bunny Grant and Percy Hayles, and in the 1970s/80s the incomparable Mr Mike McCallum and Messrs Trevor Berbick and Richard 'Shrimpy' Clarke.
In more recent years, Mr Jones' predecessors will have seen Jamaican boxing come pretty close to death's door before this latter-day, television-induced resuscitation.
Credit is due to all those who have had a hand in this initiative. It is incumbent on them to ensure that Jamaican boxing benefits in as sustainable a manner as is possible.
Also, other sporting associations, now struggling to cope with the challenges of today's world should watch closely and learn.
POST A COMMENT
You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.
HOUSE RULES
1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.
2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.
3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.
4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.
5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.
6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.
7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.
Other Stories
The JTA must act to redeem itself
0 comments
Dr Phillips should remind us why the PNP won the elections
10 comments
Budget debate is about Jamaica's future, not JLP and PNP
4 comments
Designating Mandeville a university town makes sense
3 comments
5 comments
Time to shift from austerity to growth strategy
4 comments
Adopt the Grace Foods template
0 comments
3 comments
Now you're talking, Mr Christie!
7 comments
Gov't must use tax policy, fiscal expenditure to reduce income inequality
0 comments
JPS’s first task is rebuilding trust
0 comments
Complete the circle of Independence
10 comments
Carib should take damaging rum subsidies to WTO
0 comments
0 comments
Nice move to encourage Jamaicans to vacation at home
2 comments
More tax raids, yes, but more finesse too, TAJ!
3 comments
What would we do without PetroCaribe?
1 comments
Why Monsieur Sarkozy became a one-term president
2 comments
Are these the leaders of tomorrow?
9 comments
Politics of appointing and recalling our diplomats
3 comments





