|
YouTube™ Channel
RSS Feeds twitter™

Editorial

Zimbabwean discipline trumps Windies slackness

Saturday, March 06, 2010



In sport, as in every other aspect of life, there must be proper, sustained planning and preparation if success is to be achieved.

The Zimbabwe cricket team are admirably advertising that basic principle on their current tour of the Caribbean.

Zimbabwe's cricket has suffered serious damage in recent years as a result of quarrels and friction not unrelated to wider problems of poor political leadership, racial divisions and inequitable land ownership that have threatened the very fabric of that southern African nation.

A major fallout of the crisis in cricket was a mass walkout of some of the country's leading players -- mostly white -- earlier in the decade. It led to Zimbabwe voluntarily withdrawing from Test cricket in 2006 while seeking to rebuild from the junior level and keeping in touch with the international game by way of the limited overs format.

Reports out of Zimbabwe suggest that the cricket authorities responded to the crisis by completely revamping their domestic game while building their junior programme with the help of a cricket academy. Several of those who walked away from Zimbabwe cricket are returning -- as players and coaches.

The ambition now is to build on the gains so far and to return to Test match cricket as speedily as possible.

West Indians can be in no doubt that Zimbabwe are well on track. Their cricket so far on tour has been thoughtful, focused and disciplined. In the process they have put to shame their Caribbean hosts who have been shoddy and slack, at best.

The contrast was clear in Sunday's Twenty-20 game at the Queen's Park Oval in Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago. Confronted by a dry, dusty pitch conducive to spin bowling, the visitors included several spinners in their team.

The hosts -- clearly unaware of the situation in their own backyard -- selected just one spinner in their playing 11, the left-arm orthodox Mr Sulieman Benn who proceeded to illustrate the nature of the pitch by taking four wickets for six runs from his four overs. Zimbabwe's multiple spinners then overwhelmed the West Indies batting to give their team a comfortable victory.

Thursday's 50-50 game may have gone down to the wire with the lowly rated visitors winning by just two runs, but again it was their focus and discipline that ultimately made the difference against a West Indies team that visibly choked when placed under pressure.

Of course, as we have often said in this space, the problems in West Indies cricket are not confined to the actual cricket. Rather, the inconsistent on-field performances are reflective of the disorder and inefficiency in the administrative offices of the West Indies Cricket Board itself.

We say again, as we have repeatedly said in the past, West Indies cricket won't see sustained improvement until its administration is completely overhauled.

But in the meantime, there is cricket to be played. This current tour apart, there is an ICC World Twenty-20 tournament to be hosted next month, to be followed by a Test and one-day tour by the powerful South Africans. The West Indies selectors, the management/coaching team and the players need to get focused. They need to start planning, preparing and implementing properly. They need to take a leaf out of Zimbabwe's book.


POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha 63402228a5924384bd6fb2a29cc62bd3
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (0)

How will men speak Mr Wilmot Perkins' name?

  1 comments

 

Building our own national identity is important

  1 comments

 

Kudos for Monday night football and Montego Bay United

  2 comments

 

Kudos to GraceKennedy for its impressive vision

  3 comments

 

Nice move on that 'Kingston Interview Waiver Programme'

  1 comments

 

The unenviable task facing Dr Peter Phillips

  1 comments

 

A compelling case for evidence sharing

  14 comments

 

How Belize is showing up Jamaica

  7 comments

 

The challenge facing our woman in London

  6 comments

 

Now that Captain Burrell has spoken...

  1 comments

 

Public sector waste scandalous

  4 comments

 

Miss Lisa Hanna's first real test

  10 comments

 

Revealing the bitter medicine no one wants to take

  12 comments

 

Commissioner Ellington is right on this one

  3 comments

 

Facing the hard realities

  12 comments

 

A word to Dr Phillips: Credibility has a short shelf life

  11 comments

 

Usain, Yohan must stay on guard

  6 comments

 

The importance of trust and the IMF negotiations

  4 comments

 

Sir Patrick in a political pickle

  16 comments

 

What's in a name as long as it spells jobs?

  16 comments

 

Today's Cartoon


Poll

Did you watch American football's Super Bowl on Sunday? 
Yes, but just for the advertisements
Yes, just for the game itself
Yes, for both the game and advertisements
No, I did not watch the Super Bowl.

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: