James, Bryant voted to All-NBA first team 11:14 AM
Police kill one of St Catherine's most wanted 10:32 AM
Two drown in St Ann on Labour Day 9:29 AM
48-y-o Seymour Hislop of St Thomas missing 9:21 AM
St Catherine higgler missing since last December 8:48 AM
British Airways plane catches fire in flight 8:27 AM
Mary J Blige faces US$3.4m federal tax lien in NJ 7:44 AM
PPM wins most seats in Cayman Islands general election 12:06 AM
Portmore lock-up escapee recaptured 11:43 PM
Boyz hold star-studded Tottenham Hotspur 11:32 PM
Editorial
Finally, wisdom prevails in SA mining disaster
Tuesday, September 04, 2012
A modicum of sense and acknowledgement of a great folly seemed to have overcome the South African Government on Sunday when its Acting Director of Public Prosecutions, Ms Nomqcobo Jiba announced that the controversial murder charges filed against 270 miners for the killings of 34 striking co-workers shot dead by police were being withdrawn.
To say that we were astonished by the initial decision to charge the miners with murder is an understatement. For we, along with the entire world, watched with horror television replays of the brutal killings committed by the police last month.
The South African police had claimed selfdefence, saying that the miners shot at them. Most of the miners, we were told, were armed with home-made clubs and machetes. However, the police claimed they recovered several handguns from the scene.
Our shock at the mass slaying, which revived memories of the actions of the evil Apartheid Government of the past, was eased somewhat when South African President Jacob Zuma ordered a judicial commission of inquiry which, we are told, is to report its findings to him by January next year.
However, when it was announced last week that the 270 miners arrested after the police killings were charged with murder under an Apartheid-era law we were stunned.
That decision by the prosecutor rubbed salt into the wounds already opened by the police action in a country where the majority were oppressed by the State in some of the worst ways imaginable for decades. And the fact that this old law is no longer in the Constitution makes the State’s action more egregious.
We had expected better from a government that strongly opposed the inhumanity that its racist predecessors displayed to the majority people of South Africa, and, indeed, from a State which only last month was represented here in Jamaica by its president, sharing with us the significance of our 50th year of separation from colonial rule.
We are not here advocating that the Government turns a blind eye to the week of violence and bloodshed that preceded what is now known as the ‘Marikana massacre’. Those responsible for the killing of 10 people, among them two police officers who were hacked, and two mine security guards who were burned alive in their vehicle, need to be arrested, charged and placed before the courts.
However, the South African State should not have sunk to the level where it was accused of “a flagrant abuse of the criminal justice system in an effort to protect the police and/or politicians”.
Ms Jiba, we hold, has done the correct thing in reversing her decision to shift the blame for the killings from the police to the miners, even though she has not said what influenced the change.
We note, though, that she has insisted that other charges, among them public violence, illegal gathering and illegal possession of firearms, will not be dropped against the 270 miners.
Those cases, she said, were being postponed pending the final investigations and the findings of a commission of inquiry.
From this distance, it appears to us that Ms Jiba has put out a fire but has kept alight a wick that, if not extinguished, could result in an explosion.
The men and women who died in the long, bitter, fight against Apartheid must now be rolling in their graves.
POST A COMMENT
HOUSE RULES
1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.
2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.
3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.
4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.
5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.
6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.
7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Other Stories
Manifestly, wantonly incorrect rating agencies
Hoping for the best from 'Caribbean Challenge'
What violence-torn St James, nay all Jamaica, can learn from Flanker
Local companies should follow Jamaica Broilers into Haiti
Capitalise on Rev Redwood's decision
Ban Ki-Moon's warning not to be taken lightly!
Ever heard of Dr Don Shirley, another great but forgotten Jamaican?
Dr Joyce Robinson, a true human treasure
The rightness of the Tivoli enquiry
Paucity of Caribbean citizens in the top echelons
No justification for NWC rate hike
Transfer sentiments about Air Jamaica to Fly Jamaica
Reparations debate needs to be settled
When the Caricom Heads of Gov't meet in July...
Cut the talk and cut the red tape


