Hear the Children's Cry condemns treatment of Mona student 3:15 PM
Health of Jamaica's children improving — Ferguson 2:58 PM
Cops looking for Jody-Ann McNarrin 2:21 PM
'Ratty' killed in motor vehicle accident 2:05 PM
Woman left lying in her own urine in jail before she died 1:15 PM
Emergency repair work disrupts water supply in St James 1:12 PM
UN: Budget cuts causing cholera deaths in Haiti 11:35 AM
Modest growth for Caribbean countries in 2012 11:32 AM
Busy denied bail 10:59 AM
Man detained over New York boy's 1979 disappearance 10:43 AM
Editorial
Let’s get that anti-gang law passed
Thursday, January 19, 2012
FROM what we have observed so far, Police Commissioner Owen Ellington is not a man given to trivial pronouncements. So, when Mr Ellington speaks we listen, because we have come to appreciate that he does so from a position of authority and detailed knowledge.
Yesterday, Commissioner Ellington reminded us that gangs are still plying their trade of death in communities throughout the country and are responsible for the frightening spike in murders since the start of this year. Thankfully though, Commissioner Ellington and his team have responded to this upsurge in murders in a manner which has prevented the problem from spiralling out of control.
However, though the measures put in place by the constabulary to counter the gangs appear to be having some effect, there is obvious need for stronger legislative support. In that regard, we would urge our lawmakers to give swift attention to the long discussed anti-gang legislation in this parliamentary session.
We recall that Mr Andrew Holness, when he was sworn in as prime minister in October last year, said that the "anti-gang legislation to address the threat of organised crime" would be brought to Parliament very soon.
A month before that, former National Security Minister Dwight Nelson assured the Police Federation's 67th annual joint central conference in St Ann that the anti-gang legislation was before the Cabinet and was scheduled for discussion.
We accept that the December 29 parliamentary elections would have placed a hold on these discussions. However, with the political atmosphere now settled, we believe that our parliamentarians should ensure that this bill does not languish in the House, as is the fate of too many other important pieces of legislation.
For it is clear that the police need as much help as they can get to effectively deal with the terrorists who are bent on spreading mayhem at will.
We would also urge Jamaicans to regard the constabulary's unrelenting efforts to disrupt and destroy gang activities as being in the best interest of the country. Criminal gang activities endanger the well-being of all of us and are detrimental to investment which is required to provide new jobs for law-abiding and industrious citizens.
Therefore, as we have pointed out in this space before, Jamaicans should not shy away from providing the security forces with information about criminals and their activities because that kind of co-operation is critical to the social stability of any society.
The new Portia Simpson Miller administration, through its security minister Mr Peter Bunting, has already declared its intention to send "a strong message to hoodlums who seem intent on disrupting and destroying lives" and to respond decisively to any increase in criminality.
A significant element of that response, we suggest, is to push hard to have the anti-gang legislation debated, fine-tuned, passed and implemented. Of course, we expect that the police will, in their operations, abide by the provisions of the bill when it becomes law and not give those who will object any reason to say "We told you so".
POST A COMMENT
You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.
HOUSE RULES
1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.
2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.
3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.
4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.
5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.
6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.
7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.
Other Stories
The JTA must act to redeem itself
Dr Phillips should remind us why the PNP won the elections
Budget debate is about Jamaica's future, not JLP and PNP
Designating Mandeville a university town makes sense
Time to shift from austerity to growth strategy
Adopt the Grace Foods template
Now you're talking, Mr Christie!
Gov't must use tax policy, fiscal expenditure to reduce income inequality
JPS’s first task is rebuilding trust
Complete the circle of Independence
Carib should take damaging rum subsidies to WTO
Nice move to encourage Jamaicans to vacation at home
More tax raids, yes, but more finesse too, TAJ!
What would we do without PetroCaribe?
Why Monsieur Sarkozy became a one-term president
Are these the leaders of tomorrow?
Politics of appointing and recalling our diplomats





