Letters to the Editor

Watch, but leave North Korea alone

Monday, September 18, 2017

Print this page Email A Friend!

Dear Editor,

What drives a country into possessing weapons of mass destruction that could kill millions of people and wipe an entire city off the map in one trip? Power, prestige, or protection? How about we go with pride and the licence to bully?

The US is famous for its enviable status of being the first country to assemble an atomic bomb. Impressively, the US, of course, was the first to use it. In its self-appointed role as the world's police, the US and its allies feel justified to own a stockpile of nuclear weapons, yet refuse to allow the North Koreans to boost what's left of their already damaged public image by inventing nukes of their own.

Pakistan, Israel and India (the supposed 'friends' of the West) threw caution to the wind and acquired nukes for themselves. Interestingly, they weren't bullied into getting rid of their nuclear projects — maybe because they drink at the same bar with their betters. The North Koreans are the isolated nerds who are constantly flattered as the world's most hated nation — with the most sacrilegious Government — and having a monster ego! Hence, allowing the creepy loners to keep their nukes could be terrifyingly dangerous — much more dangerous now that they've procured a ballistic missile that could badly hurt the US.

Should the US invade North Korea in a bid to forcefully rid them of their nukes and topple the Government of Kim Jong Un? It will require a lot more than war threats or heavy sanctions — which they've grown quite accustomed to — to get the resilient North Koreans to forfeit what seems to be their only plausible lifeline.

No one would hurriedly classify North Korea's leader as a drunken fool who's merely aiming to attack America just because his ego said so. Kim Jong Un is fully aware that an attack on the US will be met with destructive consequences. He isn't suicidal! The North Koreans are unlikely to use their nukes, unless they run out of options, if the US carries out its threat of military action. Waging a war, or tempting the North Koreans to strike first, only endangers the lives of US citizens which are bound to be lost in the event of a North Korean attack.

Why can't the US learn to live with a nuclear-armed North Korea the same way it has lived with a nuclear-armed Russia, China, India, Pakistan and Israel?

Nimi Princewill







1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper � email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

comments powered by Disqus



Today's Cartoon

Click image to view full size editorial cartoon