|

Letters to the Editor

Thanks to the Gov't, I'm now a kidnapped Claro Digicel customer

Sunday, January 15, 2012



Dear Editor,

The Government has allowed Digicel to kidnap my mobile phone service. As a businessman I note with much shock and disappointment the action on the part of the Government and Digicel in what is now the 'takeover' of the Claro network.

Let me state that although I was once a Digicel customer when they first entered the market, I had terminated my relationship with them. I was not interested in doing business with them. You can then imagine my extreme objection to the fact that I am now corralled and forced to be part of this network of which I wanted no part.

The way I understand it is that the initial condition to which the then PM Bruce Golding accented, that Digicel operate the Claro network independently, was subsequently changed by his successor, PM Andrew Holness.

At the time of the announcement that the 'takeover' was now complete, Digicel suggested that its acquiring Claro was good for Jamaica. I disagree.

The basis of my disagreement is this: it will now cost me more money to make calls to my other Claro (now Digicel) numbers and to LIME numbers. With my Claro deal I had a closed user group (CUG) plan with approximately 20 persons. This provided my business with significant savings; which is the reason I took the plan in the first place.

I will break it down for you. As a Claro customer I paid $4 per minute to make a Claro to Claro (out of CUG) call, $5 per minute to call LIME and Flow phones, and $10 per minute to call Digicel phones. Now as a kidnapped Digicel customer I will pay $10/$8 per minute (peak and off peak) for Digicel to Digicel calls and $14/$13.80 (peak and off peak) to call LIME phones. I object that I am now being asked to pay more for the same service, with a network that was not my preference. This is extortion.

Digicel's customers may not be aware, or even care that they pay this much for their calls, but I do, I have to. It is an operational saving for my business that has now been eroded by this decision. I have to make the point that Digicel cannot determine that most of my friends are on their network, suggesting to me that it is therefore better for me. That is presumptuous and completely unacceptable.

I was of the view that with the advent of the liberalisation of the telecoms sector I would have choices. I made a choice to be with a network that I felt was most beneficial to my needs, yet the Government has allowed me to be kidnapped by Digicel — a network I did not choose.

D Fletcher

dwightafletcher@gmail.com



POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha c7c64a411a2a4c669d22c411816c557a
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (4)


1/20/2012
I share your frustration! We should have a choice. http://rants.andreobrown.com/2012/01/hey-thats-my-number.html
diehardr sickheads
1/15/2012
the 17.75 rate was from the pnp was in office, they were apart of the problem giving digicel their way
diehardr sickheads
1/15/2012
switch to lime,switch to lime,switch to lime,switch to lime,switch to lime,switch to lime,switch to limeswitch to lime
J J
1/15/2012
It is thanks to Claro and Digicel, they were the ones who did the buy out and in a Free-Market economy the government can only put stipulations Not Stop the deal. You do not have to switch to Digicel, but did you really think the same privillages we enjoyed with Claro we would with Digicel even if it was operated as seperate networks? Digicel is about business not the freeness Claro gave

Include God in our children's lives

  0 comments

 

Portia, Andrew need to unite country

  2 comments

 

Eat-a-food culture disgraceful

  0 comments

 

That 'Gay Manifesto' not true

  0 comments

 

Can’t wait to hear what Google, Yahoo! have to say

  0 comments

 

How the elementary education system worked

  0 comments

 

Equity lacking in Jamaica

  1 comments

 

Assassination by anonymous e-mail is awful!

  0 comments

 

A supermarket policy that's illegal

  3 comments

 

Is this really healthy?

  2 comments

 

Three lessons from Armadale

  0 comments

 

Why risk the environment for oil?

  0 comments

 

Fire the West Indies cricket administrators

  0 comments

 

Kudos to James Newman and Philip Sherlock

  0 comments

 

Embrace positive values over lewdness

  0 comments

 

Well done so far, Mr Holness

  2 comments

 

Admiration for Archbishop Rowan Williams

  0 comments

 

A matter of vision

  0 comments

 

This is not about skin colour

  1 comments

 

Warring angels and the Aksum Kingdom

  0 comments

 

Today's Cartoon


Poll

 Do you feel buying into Facebook now is a good investment for the long-run? 
Yes
No

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: