VCB wins in Ostrava 12:55 PM
Churches raising money to fight gay marriage 12:20 PM
Customs officers arrested for larceny 10:57 AM
Holding lambastes WICB, Gibson over handling of senior players 10:52 AM
Female child found wandering Downtown 9:12 AM
GCT to go down, white rum prices going up 4:35 PM
Letters to the Editor
What's the urgency to sell Belmont property?
Tuesday, February 07, 2012
Dear Editor,
With regard to the proposed sale of the Belmont property in St Ann, directly across from the entrance to the Mystic Mountain Park and to the east of Dolphin Cove, we now see that the Development Bank of Jamaica (DBJ) is proceeding to dispose of the property.
In a letter to this paper in December, I highlighted the speed with which the Urban Development Corporation (UDC) was moving to dispose of some of the country's most valuable ecological coastline assets, with an indecent haste and lack of transparency.
Why is this being done now in the absence of a chairman at the UDC?
It is now being given some justification that the sale may proceed under the DBJ, "handling the tender in its capacity as a provider of advisory services to UDC on divestment".
What is the urgency, in the absence of a board and chairman at the UDC?
Were the Northern Jamaica Conservation Association, St Ann Parish Development Committee, St Ann Chamber of Commerce or St Ann Social Developement Commission consulted for their input?
In the most recent commentary on the sale, the DBJ has stated that it is not at liberty to publicly disclose the valuation, during the public tender process: this is understandably so of the financial offer, but what of the more important consideration: its use?
Why is the public not being allowed to have knowledge of what use the tenders have proposed to put the land to, prior to sale?
Is its use going to be in line with Jamaica's iconic example of environmentally sustainable tourism, whose flora, beach and extensive reef system need to be rehabilitated, replanted, regenerated, preserved and protected for the people of Jamaica, or ostensibly for the purpose of developers turning that narrow strip of land, (3.4) acres, into a parking lot, for a collection of 170 luxurious three-bedroom villas?
Another concrete eyesore.
When are Jamaica's interests going to be the priority?
Anthony Moyston
Parottee, St Elizabeth
amoyston@gmail.com
Other Stories
Include God in our children's lives
0 comments
Portia, Andrew need to unite country
2 comments
Eat-a-food culture disgraceful
0 comments
0 comments
Can’t wait to hear what Google, Yahoo! have to say
0 comments
How the elementary education system worked
0 comments
1 comments
Assassination by anonymous e-mail is awful!
0 comments
A supermarket policy that's illegal
3 comments
2 comments
0 comments
Why risk the environment for oil?
0 comments
Fire the West Indies cricket administrators
0 comments
Kudos to James Newman and Philip Sherlock
0 comments
Embrace positive values over lewdness
0 comments
2 comments
Admiration for Archbishop Rowan Williams
0 comments
0 comments
1 comments
Warring angels and the Aksum Kingdom
0 comments





