|

Letters to the Editor

Who fail to deliver must go

Monday, November 01, 2010



Dear Editor,

Government is that neutral party that extracts from private citizens their share of resources needed to furnish the country with its necessary amenities - health, education, security and other services, including water, power, and roads.

It is critical that government ministers portray themselves as good stewards, because their performances will determine the quality of life citizens will enjoy. We are duly concerned about their associations with questionable elements. We are concerned about whose interest they enter into contractual arrangements because it always costs us. We are concerned about matters such as the Cuban light bulb misappropriation, the Finsac saga, the Coke and Manatt, Phelps and Phillips affair and the many other indiscretions of public officials. Whatever they do costs us financially, socially and otherwise.

We breathe a sigh of relief whenever we hear from Greg Christie and we certainly hope that he's being duly diligent in digging up the facts of certain officials' carryings on. I do not know that we are saying that there should not be a difference of opinion between the OCG and the DPP. We probably would prefer not to know. But doesn't the accused at least get the chance of feeling that they are being given due process? But what about the embarrassment, especially if you are innocent? So maybe the manner of communication could be dressed up. But, ohh, the vigilance should be unrelenting.

We are often flummoxed that for a country so pregnant with skills and abilities, we have not made any greater headway in delivering to the average Jamaican the quality of life we are clearly capable of. When we write I don't believe we take issue with individuals per se, even though we call names. The names are only representative of a condition we are concerned about and are incidental. Names also allow for easy identification of the issue being dealt with.

We are aware that it will take more than a government to move a country forward. It will also take private interests to act with heart as well. So whereas the Jamaica Debt Exchange programme was intended to be borne by the government creditors, the costs are being redeemed from the consumer who always bears the cost, it seems. We would have thought that the spirit of the JDX was that in a depressed economy the banks would understandably earn less. But...

Perhaps, we should be instructed by Obama's landmark health-reform programme. Or maybe we should learn from the Digicel/Lime (Cable and Wireless) phenomenon. Something must be done to break free from the stronghold of these commercial banks.

We should not begrudge politicians' earnings. They should be well paid because our expectations of them are high. And if they fail to deliver they should go.

Charles Evans

Mandeville, Manchester

charles.evans@ncu.edu.jm



POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha 3aa51fa0576144d89cc8935d338ec990
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (0)

Include God in our children's lives

  0 comments

 

Portia, Andrew need to unite country

  2 comments

 

Eat-a-food culture disgraceful

  0 comments

 

That 'Gay Manifesto' not true

  0 comments

 

Can’t wait to hear what Google, Yahoo! have to say

  0 comments

 

How the elementary education system worked

  0 comments

 

Equity lacking in Jamaica

  1 comments

 

Assassination by anonymous e-mail is awful!

  0 comments

 

A supermarket policy that's illegal

  3 comments

 

Is this really healthy?

  2 comments

 

Three lessons from Armadale

  0 comments

 

Why risk the environment for oil?

  0 comments

 

Fire the West Indies cricket administrators

  0 comments

 

Kudos to James Newman and Philip Sherlock

  0 comments

 

Embrace positive values over lewdness

  0 comments

 

Well done so far, Mr Holness

  2 comments

 

Admiration for Archbishop Rowan Williams

  0 comments

 

A matter of vision

  0 comments

 

This is not about skin colour

  1 comments

 

Warring angels and the Aksum Kingdom

  0 comments

 

Today's Cartoon


Poll

 Do you feel buying into Facebook now is a good investment for the long-run? 
Yes
No

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: