|

All Woman

Forced to use my married name

By Margarette MACAULAY

Monday, January 02, 2012



Dear Mrs Macaulay,

I am an account holder at a parish credit union. I am experiencing great difficulty in having my marital name removed from an account I operate with the institution. I am divorced. I have supplied the institution with a copy of the decree absolute. My identification cards and my pay advice with my maiden name have also being supplied with the application I made to them. I started the account with my maiden name and after marriage, the married name was added. On the account I am first name, maiden name, married name. They have refused to remove the name saying that I need to do a deed poll or apply to the court to stop using the marital name. Is that true? Is it right that they are forcing me to use that name? I do not have any form of identification with the married name. Please advise me what to do. I want to move on from that traumatic marriage and they are trying to force me to continue using the name that reminds me of the trauma I suffered.

I sense your frustration while reading your letter as this is a vexed issue. I am a little confused, though, about your actual position. Is it that you never chose to adopt your husband's name at all? You say you have no form of identification with the married name on it. If this is so, how did the credit union come to add the married name to your name on the account which you had opened and held in your maiden name? Did you do this or did they take it upon themselves to just enter your then husband's name to that on the account and so made it yours?

If they did this, they would be completely wrong because they would have imposed upon you what should have been your free and sole choice (hopefully, you would have discussed this matter with your ex-husband before marriage).

But it seems to me, that you must have informed them of your marriage and of the name of your then husband, otherwise, how would they have known about it? If you told them, I am at a loss to understand why you did so, if as you say, you continued to keep as your identity for all other purposes, your blood family name/maiden name.

Anyway, by whatever means this occurred, after it was done and you knew of the change, you did nothing to have it rectified. You, however, seemingly operated your account with them for some time with the married name. This being so, then such a name for all intents and purposes, as far as they were and are concerned, was and is your true identity, unless you can show that it was their error. But based on what I have stated earlier herein, I do not see how claim of it being their mistake would hold.

So, if this was so, and it was thereafter used by you with them as your true identity, as they have said, you will then have to change it by deed poll, or you could, under the inherent jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, apply for a declaration that such a name was never your name and for a consequential order, directed to the credit union, to rectify their records by reverting to your true identity.

I said this matter is a vexed issue because a married woman can merely choose to adopt her husband's surname and just start to use it without any formal legal act, but it then permanently becomes her identity by adoption. She just has to inform offices and agencies that so and so is now her name, and it's often accepted informally. The issue is, if this is done informally, why, when the woman wants it undone, must she do a deed poll?

Indeed, all Government agencies and private concerns require a formal change by deed poll. The raison d'etre is that once she adopted and used the 'married' name, then that became her true and legal identity. She announced to the world by the adoption and its usage that this is her name by which she is to be known and this became her identity, which sticks to her, so when a change becomes necessary, she must effect the change formally. This practice has become so embedded that it would probably take legislation to cause a change of it.

So, my dear, I am sorry to say that the deed poll is the quickest way to go and certainly the least frustrating means of getting the credit union to change their records so you can get rid of this name which is causing you continuous discomfort.

Finally, I must highlight the fact that there is no legal requirement that any wife must adopt her husband's name. It is a matter solely of her choice, but once she chooses and uses her husband's name as hers, it becomes her identity legally. Then, once she has all her documents of identity issued in her adopted name, and changes her name in other records, if in the future she wishes to drop it and change back to her maiden name, she would have to effect another change of her identity.

The law says that to change your identity you must do so by deed poll, except, of course, when a married woman adopts her husband's name. This I firmly believe is a leftover of the possessory, paternalistic and discriminatory practices which visited upon married women for centuries.

I hope I have clarified the position for you because it seems to me that the credit union had no other choice but to require this of you because of the embedded practice which prevails.

Best wishes.

Margarette May Macaulay is an attorney-at-law and a women's and children's rights advocate. Send questions via e-mail to allwoman@jamaicaobserver.com; or write to All Woman, 40-42 1/2 Beechwood Avenue, Kingston 5. Mrs Macaulay cannot give advice via e-mail.

DISCLAIMER:

The contents of this article are for informational purposes only and must not be relied upon as an alternative to legal advice from your own attorney.



POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha 7bb8dc6fadaa4183969239b042decbe4
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (8)

Cindy Lee
1/6/2012
Did the lawyer read what the writer wrote or did she just not read with understanding? She's asking a whole lot of questions (about the writer's documents/ids with maiden name) that she wouldn't need to ask if she read with understanding.
I think the easiest way to get this matter dealt with, esp if she has lots of money with the CU, is to write a letter to the GM explaining exactly y she'll be closing her a/c & moving to another CU. I bet they'd be more than willing to meet her request.
Antonette W.
1/4/2012
Oh Lord! Here we go again with the same men whining about "men" being bashed. All the woman wants to know is how to get her account in her own name. Don't any of you chronic whining guys ever read the positive comments many women make regarding their marriages or relationships? Don't you ever see examples of good women referenced in JO or around you? It's a new year, but same old, negative crap! Ooonu miserable and pessimistic eeh! Try to see the cup half full for a change.
Sean H.
1/4/2012
J A M
The problem is that opening the new account may require her to get letters of reccomendation and her financial status be rescored. Her credit rating could drop if, in calculating her credit worthiness her marital status and husband's income were factored.
Financial institutions are like that ... even if you have 10 accts and are opening one more you get a hassle. She could also check with the FSC to see if the institution is overstepping its bounds.
Sean H.
1/4/2012
Just as to throw out a question in the forum:
Why not have the law automatically revert to her maiden name at the point of divirce? That solves two contentious issues a) her wanting to get rid of his name and b) him wanting her to stop using his name after the split.
Already women can by deed poll remove his name but there are many men whose exes continue to benefit from his name long after divorce. That issue needs to be addressed too.

J A M
1/4/2012
Close the existing accounts and re-open in your maiden name using your current identifications which do not have the married names.
Kenneth Campbell
1/4/2012
It is popular to bash men, if this is not done, money is not made and people don't feel good about themselves. Lets face it men are easiest to blame for all the ills women face. In this case all this woman has to do is a deed poll that is a legal requirement but instead she has chosen to write a lawyer complaining about the credit union. The lawyer gives a long list of opinions and advice which still ends up pointing her to a DEED POLL. 2012, lets bash marriage and men some more, it nice.
Gary Smith
1/3/2012
We enter into 2012 with the same mindset. Everything seems to be a problem with marriage and relationships. With such a evil thing in the works why don't we just abolish marriage for a free market system of relationships or better yet, since men seem to be at the centre of problems in marriages, get rid of men all together. We have rules so just obey them, do your deed poll and get on with your life, its that simple, why the rhetoric on possessory, paternalistic and discriminatory practices .
Kimberly John
1/2/2012
Thanks for your response Ms. Macaulay. Can you also address the Registrar General's Department's policy of forcing women to change their names to their husbands. My name was changed on their Marriage application and on the birth certificate of my daughter. In fact, my name is not even on my daughter's birth certificate because they changed it (i.e. removed my last name and replaced it with my husband's) without consulting me. When I protested, they said, 'That's how it's done in Jamaica'.

Why he would do anything for love, and do that

  5 comments

 

How to make a will

  0 comments

 

Jacqueline Cole: Life, work, inspiration

  2 comments

 

I tried everything but I can't lose weight

  0 comments

 

Common weight loss myths debunked

  0 comments

 

Why he won't date you

  5 comments

 

What's the possibility of pregnancy with an erratic cycle?

  0 comments

 

Cheating, a pregnancy and a new boyfriend

  0 comments

 

Dashboard 101: know the symbols

  0 comments

 

A victim of fraud

  0 comments

 

Are you dating, a fling or a friend with benefits?

  0 comments

 

Look of the Week - May 21

  0 comments

 

VOWS: Sealed with a kiss

  0 comments

 

Little People Snapshots - May 21

  0 comments

 

Thank God it’s Monday!

  0 comments

 

8 ways to know he will be a good dad

  0 comments

 

Keeping your child safe - Pt 2

  0 comments

 

Average Is Out… It's Avant Garde!

  0 comments

 

Mums on The Runway

  0 comments

 

VOWS: To Love and Respect

  0 comments

 

Today's Cartoon


Poll

 Do you feel buying into Facebook now is a good investment for the long-run? 
Yes
No

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: