|

All Woman

I want the children to get the house

By Margarette MACAULAY

Monday, January 16, 2012



Dear Mrs Macaulay,

I have been married for 13 years but I am no longer living with my husband. My husband owned a house with his three brothers which I bought, but I kept my husband's name on the title. He owns 50 per cent of the property. We have two children together - 25 and 15. The children live at this residence with their father. I pay every single bill for them and for my husband. I have also been paying to do upgrades to the property. My husband works but does not earn a lot and he is sick so I help him out with his medical expenses as well. I am the only one who took a mortgage on the house which is owned as tenants-in-common. I want to divorce my husband and get on with my life but I want to ensure that the children are given his portion of the property since I am the only person footing all the bills. He has a female friend I am told who visits him frequently and I do not wish for the other half of the property to go to anyone besides his children. He is also spiteful enough that he might leave his half to his brothers and not his children. Apart from doing a transfer of his share to the children (which he is not willing to do), and a will, please advise me how I can ensure that he leaves his share to our children. I thought about having the title changed to joint tenancy but if I die first he would end up getting my share and I do not want that. He is willing to sign a document that will give his share to the children after he passes.

My dear, your kindness and generosity to your estranged husband is surprising and idealistic. Yet you don't have in place an agreement with him that he holds his interest in trust for your children which I am sure was your intent at the time you bought the premises.

You could have also purchased the property and registered it in your name alone and then entered into an agreement with him, that he could continue to live there for the rest of his life rent free, but with the proviso that if he remarries in the event of the dissolution of your marriage, or seeks to cohabit there with another woman, that his occupation thereof should automatically cease.

You did neither of these, but since you can, I am sure, prove that you bought the premises, and obtained and are paying the mortgage on your own, if you can also show that the reason you put his name on the title as a tenant-in-common of 50 per cent interest was because the children were young and that it was being held by him in trust for them, then you can apply to the court for a declaration of interests and for a partition of interests in the property.

You should, in such circumstances, apply for a declaration that you are entitled to 100 per cent of the interests in the property.

He after all received his one-third of the proceeds of sale of the property when you bought it. However, you had to continue to pay for the household expenses and for the maintenance of the children and also assist with his medical expenses!

Because he is not prepared to sign a transfer to pass the 50 per cent interest he holds by your acts, and yet he says he is willing to sign a document which will give his share to the children after his death, you can assume that he may feel that in this way, he can renege on such an agreement.

What you must have is an agreement under and by virtue of the Property (Rights of Spouses) Act. Pursuant to this Act, as long as you follow the provisions relating to spousal agreements strictly, you and your children would be protected by an agreement signed by him.

Each of you must have your own lawyers, who must certify on the agreement that they explained all the terms of the agreement to you and that you stated that you understood and agreed with them before appending your signature to the agreement in their presence.

Such an agreement would bind him and his estate.

You must seek the services of an attorney-at-law in order to protect and ensure that your children obtain the property interest which you sought to obtain for them from their father, who made no contribution to the acquisition of it for them.

Good luck. You must do this before you finally obtain your divorce.

Margarette May Macaulay is an attorney-at-law and a women's and children's rights advocate. Send questions via e-mail to allwoman@jamaicaobserver.com; or write to All Woman, 40-42 1/2 Beechwood Avenue, Kingston 5. Mrs Macaulay cannot give advice via e-mail.

DISCLAIMER: The contents of this article are for informational purposes only and must not be relied upon as an alternative to legal advice from your own attorney.



POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha bae1e840cff5416a863fffb5444e3132
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (2)

Dan smith
1/21/2012
This woman name macauley is unfair she always take the side of the woman if it was the other way around she would want the woman to get her 50% these ladies want men to care for them and when is their time to do it its a problem
Gary Smith
1/20/2012
All this lady is saying is equivalent to a woman who was been taken cared of by their spouse, the fact that this lady is playing the roll of a typical man is causing her great pain. Indeed man do all of this and more everyday and are still fleeced of their hard earned assets. The laws says that a woman must support her husband when he is unable to do so especially sickness, it is the only time the law says that. She can leave her 50% to her kids in a tenants in common setting, she is unfair.

Why he would do anything for love, and do that

  5 comments

 

How to make a will

  0 comments

 

Jacqueline Cole: Life, work, inspiration

  2 comments

 

I tried everything but I can't lose weight

  0 comments

 

Common weight loss myths debunked

  0 comments

 

Why he won't date you

  5 comments

 

What's the possibility of pregnancy with an erratic cycle?

  0 comments

 

Cheating, a pregnancy and a new boyfriend

  0 comments

 

Dashboard 101: know the symbols

  0 comments

 

A victim of fraud

  0 comments

 

Are you dating, a fling or a friend with benefits?

  0 comments

 

Look of the Week - May 21

  0 comments

 

VOWS: Sealed with a kiss

  0 comments

 

Little People Snapshots - May 21

  0 comments

 

Thank God it’s Monday!

  0 comments

 

8 ways to know he will be a good dad

  0 comments

 

Keeping your child safe - Pt 2

  0 comments

 

Average Is Out… It's Avant Garde!

  0 comments

 

Mums on The Runway

  0 comments

 

VOWS: To Love and Respect

  0 comments

 

Today's Cartoon


Poll

 Do you feel buying into Facebook now is a good investment for the long-run? 
Yes
No

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: