Gov't, Opposition disagree over treatment of music in anti-gang Bill report

BY BALFORD HENRY Senior staff reporter

Wednesday, February 05, 2014    

Print this page Email A Friend!

Government and Opposition members of a joint select committee which reviewed the controversial Criminal Justice (Suppression of Criminal Organisations) Act are still split over the provisions of section 15 (1) of the anti-gang Bill.

This was evident in the majority and minority positions taken by the respective sides in the report on the committee's review of the Bill tabled in the House of Representatives yesterday.

Section 15 (1) provides for the use of signs, symbols, songs, et cetera "to promote criminal activity" to be treated as a criminal act by the police.

Government members expressed support for the provision, on the basis that there is scientific evidence to support the notion that cultural expressions can reinforce behaviour.

"It was also felt that if persons consumed a steady diet of messaging about killing informers and killing the police, et cetera, it would have an impact on people's behaviour and consciousness. Additionally, it was felt that in Jamaica, where there is a high murder rate, there is need to tackle those issues by changing the mindset," they stated in their majority position.

However, Opposition members expressed the view that the danger was that the section limits its focus to the activities of gangs only, and not persons generally, and targets songs rather than all forms of activities by which incitement takes place.

"The proper course would be to codify the common law in legislation, setting out the penalties for breaches of the law and carefully provide for all forms of incitement, whether in music or otherwise," the Opposition said.

They added that the proposed section could easily be interpreted as censorship of the art form, as judges would determine how a song "promotes or facilitates a gang's criminal activity".





1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed:

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email:

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

comments powered by Disqus


Do you think an increase in JUTC bus fares is justified at this time?

View Results »


Today's Cartoon

Click image to view full size editorial cartoon