|

News

Penny wise, pound foolish!

It's now costing more than necessary to control Riverton landfill fire

BY INGRID BROWN Observer senior reporter browni@jamaicaobserver.com

Thursday, February 16, 2012



IT'S a case of penny wise, pound foolish, or how a stitch in time could have saved nine, as the Government's failure to spend about $32 million to cover the Riverton City Landfill last year is now costing the country millions more.

Not only is controlling the fire — which caused smoke to blanket sections of the Corporate Area and St Catherine since last week — more expensive than it should have been, but it is also affecting the health of hundreds of residents and disrupting many schools and businesses.

A bill of close to $25 million has been racked up already by operators of heavy duty equipment and truckers who transported marl to cover the landfill to prevent the reignition of the fire, which is said to have started from natural combustion.

However, yesterday Information Minister Senator Sandrea Falconer said the landfill had not been covered in a year.

"An initial site visit indicated that the landfill had not been covered in a year, and this created a major challenge to the containment of the flare-ups," Falconer told journalists at the weekly Jamaica House Press Briefing in Kingston.

Journalists were told that it costs approximately $34 million for the initial one-off coverage of the entire landfill, and between $28 million and $32 million for its annual maintenance.

Director of operations at the National Solid Waste Management Authority (NSWMA), Colonel Allan Douglas said financial challenges prevented the landfill being covered last year.

"Because of budgetary constraints we have not been able to have the covering necessary over the past year, but every effort is going to be made now to ensure that we are provided with the funds to provide cover material," Douglas told the press briefing.

He said the NSWMA had provided material for covering the landfill whenever the opportunity presented itself, but admitted that it was not to the desirable extent.

"As we move forward, I think we understand that funds will have to be provided and resources to prevent anything of this nature happening again," he said.

Meanwhile, director general of the Office of Disaster Preparedness and Emergency Management Ronald Jackson declined to say how much more money would be added to the projected $25-million bill committed for work already done for the first three of a projected eight-day exercise.

"We are scaling back, and several pieces of the unnecessary equipment were removed from the site and so we have to allow the back office accounting to work... so I don't want to give you a figure off the top of my head," he said, explaining, however, that everything was being done to keep within the $60 million, which was initially budgeted for the worst case scenario.

Having met the three-day deadline to extinguish the fire, Jackson said the team was working to keep the cooling and covering phase within the estimated five days which ends tomorrow.

Jackson added that some communities would continue to be affected for a while longer although significant progress had been made in controlling the smoke.

"We continue to monitor it and the conditions on site are significantly improved and continue to get better," he said, noting that a scaled back firefighting team is on location at the landfill for any eventualities.



POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha d020a89e7d724e2ebd6b0f593c1afc81
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (18)

0o k
2/16/2012
oops not Ms. Grange of course it is Ms. Joan Gordon Weble
0o k
2/16/2012
So Ms. Grange practiced cost avoidance? Well she is a hero, isn't this the first time that someone actually saved some money at Riverton? She also allowed the Comrade workers at the dump, to upgrade their skills. She for the first time produced a product other than corruption, hot air and smoke out of the dump, that was sold and exported from Jamaica.
0o k
2/16/2012
This is Comrade Landfill and everyone who is born and raised in Kingston knows it. Try to move, alter it, do any work in Riverton, without Comrade permission and see what happens.
trudy brown
2/16/2012
The term 'budgetary constraints' seems to be the easiest explanation for not getting things done in this country regardless of the fact that we (the public) are being forced to pay increased taxes. I once thought that an increase in taxes would mean improved infrastructure...silly me.
Paul Gentles
2/16/2012
So with all the prolific spending during the previous admin such "necessities" as the Riverton Dump was viewed as a "luxury" so funds were not made available?
Who in their wildest dreams dare allude that those guys were any good financial managers of the nations business? Ja was left falling apart!!
Paul Gentles
2/16/2012
Nero fiddles whilst Rome burns..slow to act, indecisive in managing the peoples affairs and resources. In other countries presiding ministers lose their job as this is seen as incompetence. Shows why we are always over budget, our ministers know nothing about eficiency.
Nejeeper KNG
2/16/2012
All these incidents have enlightened us in the sense that it is obvious that there are no emergency response policies in place to respond to these emergencies. There are no policies in place for prevention; successive Admin are just winging it. Private trucking companies are contracted to truck marl to the landfill so why is the NSWMA unable to collect garbage in numerous locations claiming that several units were used to assist with fire fighting initiatives at the Riverton landfill? Cont….
Nejeeper KNG
2/16/2012
….Why are we pointing fingers instead of taking a closer look at why we are using garbage trucks to fight fires and allowing trash to pile up creating more health hazards? Now; if they can’t manage trash should we expect these people to manage our economy? Mismanagement and fabrications have become the norm. We have been victimized by our own from politicians to the under-performing tribal teachers who are looking out for their interest instead of the students' who are failing academics.
RED ANTS
2/16/2012
See what i am talking about when people attack me wrongfully and i make my defense observer does not post it.@AJ.I did not reply to your accusation but the usual thing happen.It suits you not to twist what someone posted because you won't gain political mileage from it.
Jeff Orange
2/16/2012
As part of the salary package of the former head of the NSWMA , she received a significant performance bonus based on the "savings" the NSWMA realized during her reign. Cost avoidance would ultimately results in a higher salary. One might question if she deliberately spent less to make more money and the delay in covering the landfill was done to boost her salary at the risk of fires at the landfill. In some countries, the covering is done daily to minimize the risk of firs at the landfill.
christopher Isaacs
2/16/2012
@ Anthony Johnson, why do you seek to give credence to stupidity? I am very sure that all or at least 90% of persons who gained employment during the fires are all PNP supporters. Was the ANTS saying that the JLP provided employment for the PNP boys?!!
christopher Isaacs
2/16/2012
Jamaica certainly gets what it deserves, instead of extinguishing the fire, thus relieving persons of the smoke nuisance they have only been able to come up with the most outrageous nonsense. They should get on with spending money for the boys and stop the nonsense excuses.
These people would have Jamaica believe that had the previous gov covered the dump, no fire would have resulted, so what then accounted for the previous fires that JW extinguished with dispatch?!!
J L
2/16/2012
In which year was the initial one-off coverage of the entire landfill done and what has been the maintenance schedule(dates) since then? Implications are that it was done and the follow-up should and has been done annually so far but just maybe we are not hearing the whole story. Just like the garbage pileup in the city all the problems at the dump are being pointed to last year. The glaring health hazard should be a prompt for the matter to be investigated in the public domain and corrected.
Winston Brown
2/16/2012
Here are some free advice. Apply sound engineering control to effectively manage the landfill. Utilize the gas from the landfill for needed renewable energy and stop the constant bickering. End of story. Key, control, manage, utilize (utilise).
Anthony Johnson
2/16/2012
@Red Ants..yesterday you stated that the JLP keep sabotaging the PNP and that it is a JLP supporter who started the fire in Riverton City. Well if you read the article above carefully you will find that it said "natural combustion" started the fire. I therefore challenge you, to go and look for the JLP supporter called Natural Combustion. Make sure when you find him, you turn him in to the police. I am sure Peter Bunting will be happy for all the intelligence gathering you can give him.
RED ANTS
2/16/2012
32 million could not get spend to cover the landfill last year which would protect people in three parishes from smoke but 100 million could spend on buying furniture to prevent a few people from working in squalor.
John Christian
2/16/2012
Humans and garbage should not co-exist....get the people who scavange out of the land fill/dump/hellhole and mange the dump as a dump...take a short flite to nw miami and see how these dumps are managed....the on ly humans in site are the heavy equipment operators....come on geniuses..lets emulate how "white people"manage dumps....and thats not racist..
Jay Brown
2/16/2012
I swear Jamaican politicians are the you can find on the planet.
Here comes the JEEP to cover the land fill

Pension reforms to be implemented this year

  0 comments

 

‘Tourism worries’ - Opposition, JHTA seek meeting with minister

  0 comments

 

Special constable accused of corruption

  0 comments

 

READY FOR 'COMBAT'

  0 comments

 

Broadcaster Wayne Whyte returns to court July 3

  0 comments

 

$2-m bail for businessman implicated in lottery scam

  0 comments

 

Ploughing through

  0 comments

 

Planting faith

  0 comments

 

Sandals observes Labour Day

  0 comments

 

This Day in History - May 26

  0 comments

 

Mexican boy's eyes gouged out 'to save the world'

  0 comments

 

UN chief cites unacceptable violence in Syria

  0 comments

 

Jamaica can't afford a stimulus budget — Phillips

  7 comments

 

23.4b Tax grab - Gov't targets extra revenue

  7 comments

 

Canada pumps $62m into Ja’s polygraph programme

  0 comments

 

Experts say budget fair

  7 comments

 

Vendor says GCT reduction not enough

  0 comments

 

Tax measures the death knell for tourism — Cummings

  5 comments

 

Teen killed for laughing at man who fell from bicycle 

  0 comments

 

Shaw says taxes will hit small businesses

  2 comments

 

Today's Cartoon


Poll

 Do you feel buying into Facebook now is a good investment for the long-run? 
Yes
No

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: