Phipps finds going tough at ATL pension fraud trial

BY PAUL HENRY Crime/Court Co-ordinator

Thursday, February 13, 2014

Print this page Email A Friend!

A detective testified in the Appliance Traders Limited (ATL) pension fraud case yesterday that she found no evidence of consent being given for distribution of surplus from the ATL Pension Fund, over which three former executives are now on trial.

Inspector Karen Harrison of the St Andrew North Police Division, and formerly of the Organised Crime Investigations Division, also defended the integrity of the investigation under lengthy examination from Queen's Counsel Frank Phipps, who spent all day chipping away at her evidence.

"My investigation revealed that consent must be given by the founder or co-founder," Harrison said in response to Phipps. The veteran attorney is representing Patrick Lynch, the former chairman of the pension fund and the man accused of being the mastermind behind the alleged forging of four letters to deceive that consent was given for the distribution.

Asked by Phipps if her investigation showed that no consent was given for the distribution of surplus from the ATL Pension Fund for the years 1998, 2002, 2005, and 2008, Harrison said 'yes'.

Phipps at times appeared frustrated that he couldn't pry the answer he was seeking out of the super calm Inspector Harrison. He asked the witness if she would agree with him that the investigation was inadequate but she insisted 'no'.

Yesterday lacked the drama of the three previous days when American forensic scientist and document examination specialist Erich Speckin was on the stand. The session was remarkable only for the absence of defence attorney K D Knight, QC, who attended for about 35 minutes in the post-lunch session, following two tough days when the prosecution constantly beat him to the punch.

Lynch, Dr Jeffery Pyne, a former managing director of Gorstew Ltd, the holding company for Gordon 'Butch' Stewart's group of companies and Catherine Barber, former general manager of the fund, are believed to have conspired in the forging of four letters to deceive that consent was given for the distribution of $1.7 billion in pension fund surplus.

The prosecution maintains that the letters, which were presented to Stewart by Barber, were backdated to 1998, 2002, 2005, and 2008. Importantly, Pyne, who signed the letters, had left the company seven months before December 15, 2010 when the alleged forgery was discovered. Lynch was the alleged mastermind behind the scheme, the court was told.

The trial continues next Wednesday, February 19, 2014 under presiding judge, Senior Magistrate Lorna Shelly Williams in the Corporate Area Resident Magistrate's Court, Half-Way-Tree.




1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper � email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed:

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email:

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

comments powered by Disqus



Today's Cartoon

Click image to view full size editorial cartoon