Death of Belize babies linked to bacteria outbreak 8:40 AM
St Ann MP urges NWC to provide potable water
T&T Opposition walk-out 7:16 AM
Nathan Robb is new MoBay Chamber of Commerce president 7:47 PM
Labour Day concert on Kingston waterfront 7:22 PM
Work continues in $42m zinc removal project 6:46 PM
Bad weather dampens Boyz preparation 5:33 PM
Two-day road closure downtown Kingston 5:17 PM
Gas price increased $1.01 4:28 PM
Man shot dead in St Andrew South 3:40 PM
News
Romney 'confused' over health care
Friday, July 06, 2012
WASHINGTON, USA (AFP) — The Wall Street Journal launched a scathing rebuke of Republican Mitt Romney yesterday, saying "confusion" over his position on a health care mandate could cost him the election against President Barack Obama.
The conservative, pro-business paper said the Romney campaign was "slowly squandering a historic opportunity" by failing to produce a coherent, unified position on the Obama-backed mandate which requires Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a fine.
Romney pushed through his own health-care reforms while governor of Massachusetts, and he deemed the individual mandate which he supported in that plan a "penalty".
After the Supreme Court ruled that the health care law was constitutional under Congress's power to levy taxes, a top Romney advisor said Monday it was "correct" that Romney agrees with the president and believes the mandate's fine should be called a penalty and not a tax.
Romney on Wednesday sought to unify his campaign message, but in conceding last week's ruling and saying the mandate was a "tax" after all, he stumbled badly, the Journal said.
The candidate failed to elaborate on the tax-versus-penalty issue, and the newspaper offered a blistering critique, saying "Romney's tax confusion" looked "politically dumb."
"If Mitt Romney loses his run for the White House, the turning point will have been his decision Monday to absolve President Obama of raising taxes on the middle class," the Journal's opinion piece began.
"In a stroke, the Romney campaign contradicted Republicans throughout the country who had used the Chief Justice's opinion to declare accurately that Mr Obama had raised taxes on the middle class."
The paper said Romney made the "unforced error" because he did not want to be pinned as a flip-flopper, a label that stuck during the Republican primaries when rivals attacked him for changing positions on issues like abortion.
"The tragedy is that for the sake of not abandoning his faulty health-care legacy in Massachusetts, Mr Romney is jeopardising his chance at becoming president," the Journal said.
It also took issue with Romney's "insular" campaign staff which "thinks it can play it safe and coast to the White House by saying the economy stinks and it's Mr Obama's fault."
The Wall Street Journal is owned by News Corp, whose chief executive Rupert Murdoch on Sunday tweeted a much-discussed warning to Romney.
Murdoch wrote on Twitter that Romney ought to hire some "real pros" and "get on the front foot soon" if he wants to defeat Obama in November.
The Journal said Romney, currently on a week-long break from the campaign, and his staff were enabling Obama's attacks on Romney as an out-of-touch multi-millionaire.
Other Stories
Decision on Finsac enquiry likely by next week
Water woes force Cypress Hall residents to the street
9,000 houses to be provided for low-income earners
ATL PENSION FRAUD CASE: Back-dated letter was no mistake, says Global CFO
PM leaves for African Union summit in Ethiopia
LABOUR DAY 2013: Lend a Hand... Build Our Land
Piped water returns to Sligoville
St Catherine CSEC candidates get free math, English lessons
Digicel backs 'Denbigh' for another three years
House buyers to be assisted with deposits
Fried scorpions anyone? Waste not, want not is Chinese food ethos
UCASE congress set for June 15
It's likely to be a wet Labour Day
McLaughlin's PPM on track to form Cayman Islands govt
Death of Belize babies linked to bacteria outbreak
St Ann MP urges NWC to provide potable water


