COVID-positive electors banned from voting in Belize's Nov 11 election

News

COVID-positive electors banned from voting in Belize's Nov 11 election

Monday, October 19, 2020

Print this page Email A Friend!


BELMOPAN, Belize (CMC) — Prime Minister Dean Barrow says voters who have been required to be in self-isolation or have tested positive for the novel coronavirus ahead of the November 11 General Election will not be allowed to vote.

“It can't be permitted. If you are COVID-positive, you are supposed to be in quarantine, either at a government facility or at your own home. There's no way we can get around that restriction, which is a legal one, a mandatory one.

“And, if we were to try to change the law to make arrangements to accommodate COVID-positive persons who wish to vote, not only would it be, I think, an extremely difficult logistical exercise, I suspect that the fears of those that are not positive, but who already have reservations or perhaps in two minds of whether they will exercise their franchise, those fears would become even more pronounced,” Barrow said.

The Elections and Boundaries Department had initially indicated that all individuals who show up at the respective polling stations will be allowed to cast their ballot.

The main Opposition People's United party (PUP) says it will be taking a position on that decision.

Section 5 of chapter 9 of the Representation of the People's Act lists the qualifications that allow people to vote in the elections. These include that the person must be a Belizean, a Commonwealth citizen residing in Belize for 12 months or more, and must be 18-years and over. The Act also lists who is disqualified, but is silent about any infectious diseases.

Belize is the latest Caribbean Community country to be holding a general election during the novel coronavirus pandemic, following St Kitts-Nevis, Suriname, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago. St Vincent and the Grenadines will hold its general election on November 5.

Prime Minister Barrow, who is stepping down from active politics, told reporters that while it is extremely regrettable “that if you are COVID-positive, in effect you are not able to exercise your franchise, we don't see that it can be otherwise.

“Certainly proxies are out. It's already a hugely complicated, nightmarish system to administer the proxy system which currently exists, in terms of public officers, in terms of the security forces and their needing to vote by proxy. I don't see a trying to, in fact, extend that to COVID-positive people. How do you verify? That is completely out of the question. Now, I understand the argument about the constitutional rights, but remember no constitutional right is absolute. You can derogate from constitutional rights on an emergency basis, that is why in the normal course, Belizeans have every right when they leave the country to come back in. We are saying no, you can't except; you comply with certain things or you go into quarantine. That is a derogation from what, in pure form, is their constitutional right,” Barrow told reporters.

Meanwhile, Barrow said that a negative COVID-19 test result presented upon arrival or determined following a rapid test at the Philip Goldson International Airport (PGIA) will now free visitors and returning Belizeans from having to quarantine for a 10-day period.

Barrow said that the Government has realised that the mounting number of people affected by the disease locally is disproportionate to the number of people arriving with negative results that are still required to self-isolate.

“It also struck us that since these people that are coming in via the PGIA, now that there is the reopening, since they come either with a negative PCR [polymerase chain reaction] test that's no older than 72 hours or are tested at the airport and are only allowed to enter the country once they are negative, it's inconsistent to say to them, “You need to quarantine for 10 days,” when there are masses and masses of untested Belizeans who are able to move freely about.

“It doesn't make a great deal of practical sense to us and hence the decision to switch from what is supposed to be or what is currently mandatory, the breach of which is punishable by court action. We thought the time had now come for us to move away from that regime and to go to moral suasion and this ramping up, as I said, of this public relations campaign.”


Now you can read the Jamaica Observer ePaper anytime, anywhere. The Jamaica Observer ePaper is available to you at home or at work, and is the same edition as the printed copy available at http://bit.ly/epaper-login


ADVERTISEMENT




POST A COMMENT

HOUSE RULES

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper � email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy



comments powered by Disqus
ADVERTISEMENT

Poll

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Today's Cartoon

Click image to view full size editorial cartoon
ADVERTISEMENT