Are permanent detentions the way forward?

Bert
Samuels

Wednesday, April 17, 2019

Print this page Email A Friend!


The head of the St James Police Division has reportedly admitted that the upsurge of post-state of emergency shootings is being contributed to by two groups. One, the detainees released following the end of the SOE and, two, those who fled the parish during the said state of emergency shootings, then returned.

If the superintendent is correct, the police were unable to charge those who are known crime contributors, even though they had them in their custody. Further, law enforcement officers were unable to track the escape and return of those who fled the parish during the state of emergency shootings.

The standard policing approach to crime — investigations leading to the arrest and charging of criminals — is not working. What else will work? Are we to rewrite our constitution and employ Guantanamo Bay-style permanent detentions to “put them away” forever, simply because we cannot find the evidence to put them on trial?

When I began my practice in the late 70s, law enforcement had no DNA, closed-circuit televison, admissibility of computer-generated evidence, or money-laundering offences, to name a few, at their disposal. In March of this year, when the anti-gang legislation was being reviewed by a joint select committee of Parliament, the police sought to have an amendment to the law to allow them to hold pre- charged suspects for seven days, with a further seven days to be added by a parish judge, if needed. This clearly unconstitutional provision was not accepted.

When the Gun Court was set up in 1974, the idea of sentences to “indefinite detention” was not permissible in law, and this was after conviction. The age-old presumption that detentions are preceded by investigations and, thereafter, charges should be laid, is protected by the Bail Act and the constitution. The former says that a citizen, having been charged, must be brought before the court within 24 hours for bail to be considered. The Jamaican Constitution prohibits indiscriminate, arbitrary, and indefinite detentions. It guarantees that we cannot be deprived of our liberty, except on reasonable grounds.

We are at a serious law enforcement crossroads, not knowing where to turn, it seems. If the police are to be relied on, the capturing of suspects is not the solution. Are we left with permitting the unending detention of people, or releasing them to continue their mayhem? Are we to live in a permanent state of emergency, or are we to retool the investigating arm of the police to be able to gather evidence and prosecute criminals successfully?

Though the constitution allows for the suspension of our right to liberty during a state of public emergency, it contemplates this as a temporary measure only. We must be able to address the serious issues of cauterising the problems during this period of a state of emergency, so that thereafter normalcy can return and our rights restored.

When we are forced to admit that capturing suspects cannot lead to placing them on trial, when we are locked into using the state of emergency to detain only, and when we cannot use science and technology to obtain convictions, we are all in a sad place. We won't get to where we ought to be until we recognise that detection and not detention is the true deterrent to crime.

Bert Samuels is an attorney-at-law. Send comments to the Observer or bert.samuels@gmail.com.


Now you can read the Jamaica Observer ePaper anytime, anywhere. The Jamaica Observer ePaper is available to you at home or at work, and is the same edition as the printed copy available at http://bit.ly/epaperlive


ADVERTISEMENT




POST A COMMENT

HOUSE RULES

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper � email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy



comments powered by Disqus
ADVERTISEMENT

Poll

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Today's Cartoon

Click image to view full size editorial cartoon
ADVERTISEMENT