Western News
Asbestos Alarm!
Health officials worried by shoddy removal of hazardous material
BY ANTHONY LEWIS Observer Writer
Thursday, January 26, 2012
LUCEA, Hanover — THE Hanover Health Department is raising concerns over the unsupervised removal and disposal of hazardous, asbestos-tainted building material on the sight of the Lucea Infirmary.
The issue was raised recently by the Chief Public Health Inspector attached to the Hanover Health Department, Derrick Storer, during the monthly sitting of the Hanover Parish Council.
Storer said the handling and removal of the potentially cancer-causing asbestos material — apparently by workmen at the site — is of great concern to the authorities including the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the National Environmental and Planning Agency (NEPA).
“We are not happy with how it is being done,” Storer said. He told the council meeting that “in the event of the removal and disposal (of the hazardous material)… a work plan indicating intention to remove and dispose of the asbestos should be submitted for approval from NEPA prior to the commencement of the activity… Upon the approval of the work plan NEPA and the MOH should be given at least 5 working days’ notification of the commencement of the planned activities to facilitate the monitoring of these activities.”
He explained that only specially trained persons should undertake the removal of asbestos-containing material. Asbestos was a preferred building material worldwide up to the middle of the 20th century, before its hazardous nature was confirmed. Experts say asbestos exposure becomes dangerous when high concentrations of fibres are inhaled over a long period.
“As asbestos is classified as hazardous, for safety of yourself, workers, clients and those around, only trained professionals with the requisite experience should prepare the work plan and undertake in the removal process,” said Storer.
“Final disposal may be done by the National Solid Waste Management Authority (NSWMA) or application may be done to an agency or hazardous waste storage transportation treatment or disposal,” he added.
A new infirmary is currently being constructed at a cost of $32 million on the grounds of the old infirmary which still houses residents.
Storer told the meeting that samples from the site were collected late last year and sent for testing. The results came back recently with a positive ID for asbestos.
“We did a report on it and we took samples and sent it to the University of the West Indies lab for testing and the sample came back… The sample was sent on the 31/03/2011 and the sample came back to show that the material from the old roof…the asbestos type is chrysotile which is forty to sixty per cent asbestos,” Storer said.
He told councillors that “as soon as asbestos is disturbed then it causes any amount of health dangers” which he said was the reason “the (unsupervised) pulling down and disposal of the roof material of the old Infirmary,” should be prevented.
POST A COMMENT
You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.
HOUSE RULES
1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.
2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.
3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.
4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.
5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.
6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.
7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.
1/26/2012
Why not just call in a consulting agency that can remove all of it in the correct manor and pay them and skip all the red tape? Are there many asbsetos removal contractors in JA if not, there are plenty in the U.S. This is a serious hazard if not handled properly.
1/26/2012
I don,t understand. A few days ago this story was on TV & I was left thinking that they had found out that it was asbestos in the roofing material & were taking the necessary precautions. This report says "the issue was raised recently". Is it the same place & is it now under control? I'm concerned because there are people in an area near me using the same material as perimeter fence! I don't know if they understand the danger.
Other Stories
Sugar production resumes at Long Pond
0 comments
Sandals CEO pledges US$100K to Flanker Peace and Justice Centre
0 comments
Education Minister lauds Howard Cooke Primary
0 comments
Positive response to earthquake drill in Santa Cruz
0 comments
Sir Howard Cooke's bio launched in Mo Bay
0 comments
0 comments
Edusport is a winner, organisers say
0 comments
Fegurson to 'look at' proposal to change name of Cornwall Regional Hospital
0 comments
Savannah FC, Wadadah FC make mid- season final
0 comments
Duanvale, Holland United to contest mid-season final
0 comments
0 comments
0 comments
Norwood Strikers seek to extend winning start
0 comments
0 comments
Express Fitness to open on Saturday
0 comments
Adventist Church in western Jamaica lauded for community work
0 comments
0 comments
Work begins on leaky roof at Lucea Fire station
0 comments
South Trelawny MP seeks help for playfield
0 comments
Police leadership change in St Elizabeth
0 comments





