Dear Editor,

Sentence under our law should not only serve to punish the guilty but should be severe – severe enough to serve as a deterrent to others. Over time sentences under our laws have outlived their usefulness and need serious revision. It is laughable that in the Manatt, Phelps and Phillips Commission of Enquiry, the punishment for Mr Brady’s refusal to testify will result in a fine of only $500 or imprisonment of three months.

This paltry sum cannot even buy a good dinner.

If Mr Brady faced severe consequences under the law, he would think twice before he thumbs his nose at the commission, stating he will not testify in the enquiry.

We see similar lack of respect for the law shown by some members of parliament and public officials who should comply with the integrity statute. It is high time that civil society demand that our lawmakers revise the penalty and sentence in order to give the law real teeth.

Authnel Reid

authnelreid@optonline.net