Dear Editor:

Once again we have heard another remark from agent of the state the Commission of Police commenting on the perceived ease with which alleged criminals receive bail. Not that I share the view, but it is the right of every citizen who is charged with a criminal offence.

The granting of bail to an individual does not mean such a person is acquitted, neither is it a barrier of a custodial sentence if such a sentence is warranted.

In my humble opinion, the issue of concern should not be the granting of bail, but rather that of conviction.

What is the percentage of persons charged with serious offences who are acquitted either at the end of a trial or on a no-case submission being upheld?

My experience would lead me to conclude that the percentage is rather high. Are the judges to be blamed for that? Is the hierarchy of the Jamaica Constabulary Force desirous of introducing the concept of ‘Pre-Trial Sentencing’ into Jamaican jurisprudence?

The role of the police is to investigate cases and gather evidence; if this is not adequately done it results in an acquittal. Should not that be of more concern to the hierarchy of the Jamaica Constabulary Force?

It is a rather loathsome practice to berate judges publicly, knowing full well that they are unlikely to respond. After all, it is highly improbable that our judges will take to the streets blocking the roads with placards bearing the words “We want justice”.

Marcus Greenwood

Attorney-at-law