Hope — fundamental, but fragile
Whether it is Peter Bunting or Peter Philips, regarding the leadership of their political party, or anyone of us in our daily lives, all humans are creatures of hope.
But what really is hope? In a nutshell, hope is confident assurance about the ‘not yet’. Be that ‘not yet’ near (later today), or far (September or when the road repairs are done), we are all enmeshed in some degree of confident assurance about it. Be it about something simple or trite (crossing a road, expecting a salary cheque or bank upload of salary), significant and life-changing (surgery, promised promotion) none of us can truly avoid indulging hope in our lives.
Indeed, even the person who is planning to or commits suicide to put an end to his/her problems is indulging hope. He or she hopes death will end it all, but what if there is an afterlife with rewards and punishments as some religionists claim?
Hope is fundamental in life, but, oh, so fragile. Bunting and Phillips, in particular, should recall the fragility of political hope. This was vividly illustrated in Jamaican political life more than once, but classically, in my view, in October 1980 when the People’s National Party (PNP) campaigned on the mantra “150-thousand strong can’t be wrong” yet lost in a landslide defeat at the polls. Hope disappointed the PNP then as much as hope disappointed the Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) in December 2011.
Hope, necessary and fundamental, but, oh, so fragile a commodity in life.
On February 11, 2011 the news broke that President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt had resigned, one day after he shocked protestors in Egypt by saying he would not step down from power and “would not be separated from Egyptian soil until his body was below the soil”. On what was his hope of remaining in power resting the day before, that is February 10?
Whether you are religious, irreligious, a sceptic, an atheist, an agnostic, or whatever, you are a creature of hope – a person who entertains confident assurance about a ‘not yet’.
What hope promises provides pleasure, but that hope might not deliver the goods promised produces an element of pain.
It is the guarantee or the guarantor that grounds your hope which determines whether your hope is just ‘blind optimism’ or ‘confident realism’.
While studying in England (1990-92) two interviews of national importance caught my attention. The one interview was with David Frost, sharp TV host and an Alexander Morley, I think, one of the moving forces behind the Channel Tunnel — the proposed undersea rail tunnel linking Britain and France. The other interview involved Margaret Thatcher, then prime minister.
The Thatcher interview was occasioned by rumours that she had been contemplating resigning as prime minister. In response, she said words to the effect, “I shall be around as prime minister for a long time.” In less than a week, she had resigned.
Hope, built on the fragile support of her colleagues in Parliament, had disappointed her and, for all I know, up to her death she was still smarting from the pain of frustrated political hope.
In the other British incident David Frost was interviewing Alexander Morley in 1990, I think, and wanted an indication of the opening date for the Channel Tunnel. Morley very guardedly indicated that they were hoping for a 1993 start. Frost pressed for a more definite date and chided the element of hope in Morley’s response to which Morley wisely replied, “We can only hope that, by 1993, it will be functional, but we can’t be sure. Are you sure you’ll be around in 1993?”
There is a folk tradition in Jamaica, maybe borrowed from elsewhere, which instructs that when you are alone in a dark area and afraid you should whistle or hum a song to keep your company. Not a sensible suggestion at all, because you are still the only one there and attracting attention by the sound you are making.
I am mischievously eager to see how Peter Bunting’s leadership challenge works out, but I urge him, Dr Phillips, and all of us to give more serious thought to the double edge of hope. It is fundamental and fragile.
Rev Clinton Chisholm is academic dean of the Caribbean Graduate School of Theology. Send comments to the Observer or clintchis@yahoo.com.