Dear Editor,

Member of Parliament for St Mary Western, Robert Montague, has recently called on the Jamaican Government to consider adopting the controversial “El Salvador model” in the fight against crime.

This model, introduced by El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele in March 2022, raised eyebrows internationally due to its suspension of certain civil liberties and mass incarcerations.

The El Salvador model, as implemented by President Bukele, involved declaring a national state of exception, which allowed the suspension of certain civil liberties, including due process. The primary aim was to combat the country’s spiralling murder rate, which consistently ranked among the world’s highest per capita. This strategy led to the mass incarceration of nearly 70,000 men suspected of gang activity, with many of them not receiving a fair trial.

The pros of the El Salvador model are:

1) Immediate action: The model demonstrated a rapid response to a critical issue, making it attractive to those who advocate for swift action against escalating crime rates.

2) Deterrence: The strict measures could act as a deterrent to potential criminals, sending a strong message that criminal activities would not be tolerated.

3) Reduced gang activity: By targeting suspected gang members, the model aimed to dismantle criminal organisations, potentially leading to a reduction in violence.

The cons of the El Salvador model are:

1) Violation of civil liberties: The suspension of civil liberties and due process raised human rights concerns and led to questions about the rule of law.

2) Lack of fair trials: Many incarcerated individuals were denied a fair trial, which is a violation of basic human rights and can lead to wrongful imprisonment.

3) Long-term sustainability: Critics argue that the model’s effectiveness may be short-lived and a more comprehensive and sustainable approach is required for lasting crime reduction.

Montague’s call for the adoption of the this model in Jamaica raises several questions about its potential effectiveness in a different cultural and legal context. Jamaica faces its unique challenges related to crime and violence, including gang activity and drug-related crimes. While some aspects of the El Salvador model might be considered, it is essential to consider the following factors:

1) Legal framework: Any adoption of a similar model in Jamaica should ensure a strong legal framework that respects human rights and due process, avoiding the violations witnessed in El Salvador.

2) Social and economic factors: Crime is often rooted in complex social and economic issues. Addressing the underlying causes of crime, such as poverty and lack of opportunity, is crucial for long-term success.

3) Comprehensive approach: A one-size-fits-all model may not be suitable for Jamaica. Policymakers should consider a comprehensive approach that combines law enforcement with social programmes, community engagement, and education.

The El Salvador Model, while effective in rapidly reducing crime rates, has raised significant human rights concerns and questions about its long-term sustainability. Its whole-scale adoption in Jamaica would require careful consideration, including modifications to ensure the protection of civil liberties and a more holistic approach to addressing the root causes of crime.

While Montague’s call for this model deserves attention, the Jamaican Government should thoroughly evaluate its potential and consider alternative strategies to combat crime effectively.

Janiel McEwan

janielmcewan17@gmail.com