Debt burden and covenant breach cloud CAC 2000’s path
CAC 2000 Limited (CAC) reported a widening net loss of $73.9 million for the nine months to July 31 as finance costs from heavy borrowings eclipsed its operational performance, according to its latest interim report.
The Kingston-based air-conditioning company’s stabilisation efforts face headwinds after a breach of covenants on a $132-million term loan with Bank of Nova Scotia Jamaica Limited, a note in the financial statements revealed. The breach technically made the full balance immediately repayable, though the bank later granted a waiver.
Chief Executive Officer Gia Abraham cited a $51.9-million improvement in operating cash flow as evidence of “operational strength”. However, this improvement was largely driven by an increase in trade payables. Concurrently, the company holds $869.6 million in trade receivables, highlighting a key challenge in converting sales into cash.
A detailed analysis of the financial statements shows that this cash flow improvement stems mainly from short-term factors. It occurs alongside more structural challenges, including the loan covenant breach, finance costs that outpace operating profits, and a sharp rise in outstanding customer receivables.
The scale of the company’s debt burden is a primary concern. Finance costs reached $48.4 million, a figure that consumed one-fifth of the entire gross profit generated in the nine months period alone. This drain is largely driven by the cost of a $250-million preference share issue and other term loans, creating a fixed financial overhead that the company’s current earnings cannot support.
This pressure came to a head with the breach of covenants on its main term loan. While the company secured a vital waiver from its bank, the event highlights the thin margin for error in its financial structure and its continued reliance on the forbearance of its lenders to maintain solvency.
The quality of the company’s improved cash flow is also under scrutiny. The positive movement was not primarily from earnings but from a strategic lengthening of payment times to suppliers and a reduction in inventory. This provided essential short-term liquidity but is not a sustainable long-term strategy for cash generation, especially while the company holds a massive $869.6 million in receivables that it has been unable to collect.
The cumulative effect of persistent losses is steadily eroding the company’s equity base. Each quarterly loss reduces retained earnings, weakening the foundation from which the company can recover and potentially limiting its options for raising new capital or financing on favourable terms.
Looking ahead, the company faces a narrowing path to recovery. Its ability to survive hinges on the success of its intensified receivables collection, a potential restructuring of its costly debt, and a return to revenue growth, all while managing the aftermath of a covenant breach that revealed the fragility of its current financial position.
