Australian general says US warns war crime allegations could prevent work with Australia’s SAS
Chief of the Australian Defense Force (ADF) Generla Angus Campbell speaks during Senate Estimates at Parliament House in Canberra, Tuesday, May 30, 2023. The US government warned that allegations of war crimes against Australian soldiers in Afghanistan could prevent U.S. forces from working with Australia’s Special Air Service Regiment, Campbell said on Wednesday. (Lukas Coch/AAP Image via AP)

CANBERRA, Australia (AP) — The United States has warned that allegations of war crimes against Australian soldiers in Afghanistan could prevent US forces from working with Australia’s Special Air Service Regiment, Australia’s defence force chief said on Wednesday.

General Angus Campbell told a Senate committee that he received a letter from the US defence attache in Canberra in March 2021 suggesting the elite SAS may have been “tainted” by the allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan raised in an Australian war crime investigation report that was made public in 2000.

Campbell said “one individual” had his “posted position adjusted” following the letter.

The letter warned that the Brereton report, which detailed “credible information” that Australian soldiers had unlawfully killed 39 Afghan prisoners and civilians, could trigger a U.S. law that prevents the country’s military working with units linked to gross violations of human rights.

“I received a letter from the defence attache of the United States Armed Forces based in Canberra, to me, indicating that the release of the Brereton report and its findings may initiate Leahy Law considerations,” Campbell said.

Campbell said he did not believe he informed the defence minister at the time and had not informed the current defence minister, Richard Marles.

Campbell was quizzed by senators on why he had not advised successive governments about such a letter from Australia’s most important security treaty partner.

Independent Senator Jacqi Lambie asked whether the government should have been advised of such a “pretty big matter.”

Campbell replied: “I think there’s a difference between ‘may’ and ‘does.’ So the defence attache was indicating that it ‘may,’ rather than it ‘does.’”

Campbell later corrected himself, telling the Senate committee that records showed he had informed the previous government’s defence minister in 2021.

The US never applied Leahy Law restrictions to the Australian military and 12 months after the letter marked the “conclusion of the issue,” Campbell said.

Marles’ office confirmed that the current defence minister, whose government came to power in elections in May last year, had not been briefed on the issue.

Marles “is briefed on matters relating to his portfolio as they arise and as is appropriate,” his office said in a statement.

Police in March charged the first Australian veteran for an alleged killing in Afghanistan, three years after the Brereton investigation found that 19 Australian special forces soldiers could face charges for illegal conduct during the conflict.

Former SAS trooper Oliver Schulz, 41, was charged with the war crime of murder in the death of an Afghan who was shot in 2012 in a wheat field in Uruzgan province.

A Federal Court judge will rule on Thursday in a defamation case brought by Australia’s most decorated living war veteran, Victoria Cross recipient and former SAS trooper Ben Roberts-Smith, against three Australian newspapers that he alleges depicted him as a criminal who broke the moral and legal rules of military engagement in Afghanistan.

Police are working with the Office of the Special Investigator, an Australian investigation agency established in 2021, to build cases against elite SAS and Commando Regiment troops who served in Afghanistan between 2005 and 2016.

More than 39,000 Australian military personnel served in Afghanistan over 20 years until the 2021 withdrawal, and 41 were killed there.

Now you can read the Jamaica Observer ePaper anytime, anywhere. The Jamaica Observer ePaper is available to you at home or at work, and is the same edition as the printed copy available at


  1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper; email addresses will not be published.
  2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.
  3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.
  4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.
  5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed:
  6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email:
  7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

Which long-term investment option is more attractive to you at the moment?