Hear the Children's Cry condemns treatment of Mona student 3:15 PM
Health of Jamaica's children improving — Ferguson 2:58 PM
Cops looking for Jody-Ann McNarrin 2:21 PM
'Ratty' killed in motor vehicle accident 2:05 PM
Woman left lying in her own urine in jail before she died 1:15 PM
Emergency repair work disrupts water supply in St James 1:12 PM
UN: Budget cuts causing cholera deaths in Haiti 11:35 AM
Modest growth for Caribbean countries in 2012 11:32 AM
Busy denied bail 10:59 AM
Man detained over New York boy's 1979 disappearance 10:43 AM
Editorial
Mr Bouterse wrong choice for Caricom chairman
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
IT will be interesting to see how Caribbean Community and Common Market (Caricom) leaders interact with the new chairman of the regional body, President Desiré Delano Bouterse of Suriname.
President Bouterse began his six-month tenure in the chair on January 1 and, in his New Year’s message, has signalled his intention to push for even closer ties within the region, using as his springboard the global economic crisis.
Quite correctly, President Bouterse acknowledged that this crisis “shows no signs of abating” and that it has created challenges of unemployment, low or negative growth, and increasing disparity between the rich and the poor.
“Given the relationship between the economic health of the major nations and its effect on us in Caricom, it would require a major effort on our part to overcome the challenges presented by this ongoing situation. It also requires that we take a hard look at the way we operate, and accept changes that may be necessary,” he said.
“We have before us an opportunity to bind ourselves even closer together. For, surely, we stand a better chance to confront these challenges as a group united, than each swimming alone against the tide.”
True words indeed from Mr Bouterse.
However, we wonder where his respect for the role of the regional institution was in 1980 when he led a military coup against the elected Government of Suriname. From then, until 1988, he basically ran the country, installing titular presidents as a sham to mask his dictatorial rule.
After democracy was restored in 1988, with the election of Mr Ramsewak Shankar, a former agriculture minister, as president, Mr Bouterse rejected an accord reached by the Government with the Surinamese Liberation Army, and by 1990 President Shankar was ousted in a military coup masterminded by Mr Bouterse.
In 1999, Mr Bouterse, who had been repeatedly accused of involvement in cocaine smuggling, was convicted, in absentia, in The Netherlands of drug trafficking. He never served the sentence because under Surinamese law nationals cannot be extradited to any foreign state.
He still has pending a military court trial for his alleged involvement in the killings of 15 political opponents, including five journalists in 1982, and while he has consistently denied direct involvement in the murders, he has accepted responsibility as the then military ruler of Suriname.
What amazed us totally was that after he managed to form a Mega Combination coalition to win last May’s general election, and was then endorsed by 36 votes — two more than the required two-thirds — as Suriname’s new head of state, Mr Bouterse was embraced by Caricom leaders.
His checkered, undemocratic past appeared to have been ignored.
We do not challenge the right of the Surinamese people to elect a leader of their choice. Neither do we advocate that Caricom shun Suriname. However, we do not believe that President Bouterse should have been given the honourable position of chairman of the regional body.
Given his past, and the fact that his trial has been suspended because of his ascension to the presidency, Mr Bouterse, we hold, does not have the moral authority to lead the region. Neither will he be able to advance, with any credibility, Caricom’s interests abroad, especially in Europe where he has a criminal conviction in an EU member state.
POST A COMMENT
You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.
HOUSE RULES
1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.
2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.
3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.
4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.
5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.
6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.
7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.
1/12/2012
So? ...it's just a case like any other in Suriname :).
BTW JamaicaObserver, have u ever thought of taking a closer look at the Dutch case (convicted)? Might be interesting for investigative journalism:
http://www.volkskrant.nl/vk/nl/2686/Binnenland/article/detail/752065/2003/03/04/Drugszaak-Bouterse-niet-heropend.dhtml
(Dutch can be translated with Google Translate).
1/12/2012
the court case reconvenes friday ...apparently not suspended!
1/11/2012
Caricom can use some real leadership now
1/11/2012
Don't worry, the Surinamese judges will deal with t. case involving Mr. Bouterse. A coup often comes with violence and is therefor never welcome, as with war, but everybody agrees war might be a necessity in some cases. The nation welcomed Mr. B's initial coup warmly in the first year(s), being tired of the old corrupt neo-colonial regime (as there are still many in Caricom), giving it much legitimacy.
So, take this into consideration in ur comments & let's look forward. W c'ld use his leadershp
1/11/2012
and richard< I think it was Suriname's turn...for no one in their right mind would make this choice unless they were unaware of his past..if that is even possible..
1/11/2012
Given his past, and the fact that his trial has been suspended "because of his ascension to the presidency, Mr Bouterse, we hold, does not have the moral authority to lead the region.
Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/editorial/Mr-Bouterse-wrong-choice-for-Caricom-chairman#ixzz1j7CqD2a5 "
This is exactly why Bouterse should never have even become president Suriname. I'm glad someone else in the region agrees on this. thanks for posting..hope his voters will see this in next election
1/10/2012
Obviously CARICOM is not the beneficiary of a Chairperson who is considered a criminal in other countries, and is under trial for alleged wrongdoing in their own country.
Jamaicans know this dilemma all too well, although not with a national leader being accused of crimes by another country, but an unofficial leader, and we all know where this led. CARICOM is a work-in-progress and presently has far too many weaknesses.
1/10/2012
Was he a choice of the member states or was it Suriname's turn?
Other Stories
The JTA must act to redeem itself
0 comments
Dr Phillips should remind us why the PNP won the elections
10 comments
Budget debate is about Jamaica's future, not JLP and PNP
4 comments
Designating Mandeville a university town makes sense
3 comments
5 comments
Time to shift from austerity to growth strategy
4 comments
Adopt the Grace Foods template
0 comments
3 comments
Now you're talking, Mr Christie!
7 comments
Gov't must use tax policy, fiscal expenditure to reduce income inequality
0 comments
JPS’s first task is rebuilding trust
0 comments
Complete the circle of Independence
10 comments
Carib should take damaging rum subsidies to WTO
0 comments
0 comments
Nice move to encourage Jamaicans to vacation at home
2 comments
More tax raids, yes, but more finesse too, TAJ!
3 comments
What would we do without PetroCaribe?
1 comments
Why Monsieur Sarkozy became a one-term president
2 comments
Are these the leaders of tomorrow?
9 comments
Politics of appointing and recalling our diplomats
3 comments





