Dear Editor,

As Jamaica approaches its 62nd anniversary of Independence, it is high time that we transition from being a constitutional monarchy to a republic.

Becoming a republic would represent a significant step forward in our journey towards fully embracing our sovereignty and reflect the desires of most Jamaicans who no longer wish to swear allegiance to the King.

Moving towards republic status, even without immediately resolving the issue of the final court of appeal, is a practical approach. While some argue that this move alone is symbolic, symbols carry immense weight in shaping national identity and pride. Most Jamaicans would likely support shedding allegiance to the monarchy, a relic of our colonial past.

Constitutional reform is a complex process and is best undertaken in phases. One crucial aspect of this process is deciding the final court of appeal. Should it remain the Privy Council or should we look to regional options like the Caribbean Court of Justice? Alternatively, should sovereignty dictate that our final court be located right here in Jamaica? This is an important question that needs further consideration and consensus-building.

While this debate and consensus-building continues, embracing republic status would be a significant step forward. Symbolism matters and renouncing allegiance to the monarchy would be a powerful symbol of national pride and sovereignty. It would affirm Jamaica’s autonomy and signal our commitment to charting our own course.

Moving towards a republic is a positive step forward, one that aligns with the desires and aspirations of a majority of Jamaicans. By moving forward with republic status while continuing to deliberate on the final court of appeal, we can demonstrate our ability to evolve as a nation while respecting diverse perspectives and fostering national unity.

It is time to move forward. An all-or-nothing approach that says the question of the final court must be resolved before we move forward with republic status is impractical. Why after nearly 62 years of Independence must I, my son, and my daughter, as Jamaicans, continue to swear allegiance to the King while this question is debated and resolved? Why can’t we proceed with the first non-controversial step while we continue to debate and build consensus on the second step?

It is high time we move forward as a nation. I am concerned that this all-or-nothing approach to constitutional reform will mean that we will remain stuck and make no progress whatsoever.

Tanya Hylton

tanya.hylton01@yahoo.com