Jamaica’s relay legacy must be protected
Relays serve as a reminder that in a sport often defined by individualism, teamwork still matters. A mixture of timing, poetry and power, relays are more than just races in the grand theatre of track and field — they are a showcase of national pride, team unity, and strategic brilliance.
For Jamaica, a nation revered globally for its track and field pedigree, relays have long stood as a testament to our collective athletic might. At the Olympics level, the platform that represents the very best that the sport has to offer, Jamaica’s relay heritage is written in gold.
In the 4x100m only the United States have won more gold medals than Jamaica in both the male and female categories. In the 4x400m, only the United States and Great Britain have medalled more often than Jamaica among the men with Jamaica sitting behind the US in the female category.
This impressive record has helped to shape the country’s legacy and is indicative of the special place that relays hold in the hearts of most Jamaicans.
From the first spark in 1952 when the team of Messrs Arthur Wint, Leslie Laing, Herb McKenley and George Rhoden, struck gold under the five rings in Helsinki, Jamaica’s consistent presence on relay podiums around the world has deep roots that also play out at every level of Jamaican life.
These performances have largely not been replicated at the World Relay Championships, an increasingly important fixture on the athletics calendar that not only crowns the world’s best teams but also serves as a qualifying gateway to the major championships — the Olympic Games and World Athletics Championships.
Where much was promised and expected at the recent 2024 World Relays Championships, the event presented a sobering moment for the Jamaican track and field fraternity.
In a campaign marred by disjointed baton exchanges, puzzling team selections, and subpar performances which led to disappointing results, the fallout has been swift with questions about preparation, athlete commitment, and federation planning dominating the discourse.
The result, just two teams — the women’s 4x100m and men’s 4x400m — have secured direct qualification to this year’s World Athletics Championships in Tokyo.
That leaves work for the men’s 4x100m, women’s 4x400m and mixed 4x400m relay teams, which must now ensure they end the qualification period with one of the 16-fastest times in the world to book a lane in Tokyo.
This underperformance is not just a momentary blip; it is a warning signal. Other nations are closing the gap, both in raw talent and in the technical finesse that relays demand. If Jamaica is to remain a force, urgent changes must be made.
There must be a renewed emphasis on relay-specific training camps, backed by incentives, well ahead of major
meets — including the World Relays — as opposed to the last-minute assembly of underprepared athletes. Chemistry and baton proficiency cannot be improvised, especially considering that Jamaica can no longer rely on having athletes with far superior foot speed when compared to their competitors.
Our elite athletes must buy into the national programme more completely and the World Relays in particular must also be seen as a priority. Its timing at the top end of the season for professionals on this side of the globe will pose a problem, but this can be addressed by adjustments to training schedules.
The World Relays have reminded us that our past laurels, while glittering, offer no guarantees. The baton is both a symbol and a challenge; Can we pass on not just medals, but the discipline and teamwork that Jamaica’s sprint legacy deserves?