Dear Editor,

I note the letter to teh editor, ‘Nothing but Wamington’s resignation’, published in the Observer edition of Thursday, August 13, 2015 from noted attorney Peter Champagnie, commenting on the behaviour of St Catherine South Western Member of Parliament Everald Warmington towards the press and noting that “the best that came from the Press Association of Jamaica was a call for Mr Warmington to apologise and promise not to behave like that in the future”.

He asked, “Why isn’t the Press Association of Jamaica [PAJ] calling for a media blackout regarding any coverage that this man will seek in his political life in the future, or his immediate resignation?”

I have the greatest respect for attorney-at-law Champagnie and appreciate his attention to, and interest in this matter, but feel compelled to make the following points.

The PAJ, through its executive, issued a statement strongly condemning Warmington’s behaviour. To go further, and call, for example, for the resignation of a duly elected member of parliament is a serious step, which in my view, if it is to be taken, is more properly to be done by the general membership of the association.

The PAJ will hold its annual general meeting next Sunday, August 23, 2015 at 12 noon, where the issue of any further response on the issue of Warmington will be discussed by the general membership in its collective wisdom.

Champagnie is not the sole person to have raised the issue of a media blackout. And, while this will, no doubt, also be discussed by the membership, I want to point out the dangers of any such approach. One of the mandates of the PAJ is to advocate for freedom of the press. Freedom of the press is not an expressly stated constitutional right in Jamaica, and we rely on the right to freedom of expression. One of the reasons freedom of expression can be such a controversial one to defend is precisely that it covers the obnoxious as well as the admirable. To advocate for the restriction of media coverage of any individual, much less a member of parliament, in my view, would run contrary to the spirit of the mandate of the PAJ.

In addition, one must be very cautious before beginning to decide who the press will and will not cover because we disapprove of their behaviour. Where would we draw the line? In addition, Warmingon remains a member of the country’s Parliament, where he represents the citizens who live in St Catherine South Western. To make a blanket decision, across the media, to refuse to cover his interventions in Parliament, or elsewhere, could arguably be described as an abuse of the awesome power of the press, and a grave disservice to the people of Jamaica and those he represents.

In my view, this would be a dangerous road that the PAJ should not tread.

Dionne Jackson Miller

President

Press Association of Jamaica

pressassociationjamaica@gmail.com