Dear Editor,

Canine behaviour and ownership in Jamaica is topical again because of the killing of a young child by a “dangerous” dog in Linstead on December 4, 2012. Visceral responses, for and against “dangerous” dog ownership have been prompted again by this regrettable incident. In considering solutions to what is perceived as a growing problem of dangerous dog attacks, several issues, human and canine, warrant thought and action.

First, preservation of human life is paramount. Paradoxically, there is no rational separation of the human element from the emerging problem: dogs are a significant part of the legitimate security services, personal and professional, solicited by Jamaicans because of the national security issues confronting the nation. Many Jamaicans acquire dogs, even ones they consider “dangerous”, for protection from criminal elements. This has spawned an unregulated breeding industry with an emerging emphasis on producing breeds inherently more vicious, both for the financial benefits of sale, and fighting as well as for the “image” attached to such ownership and association. There is a need for urgent regulation of the canine breeding industry, particularly with regard to “dangerous breeds”.

Second, owners need to consider the welfare of the dogs they acquire… the cute puppy given as a Christmas present may become a vicious adult dog when subjected to inhumane treatment vis a vis improperly directed aggression training, lack of proper veterinary care, sub-standard living conditions, etc. Responsible dog ownership rightly occupies a central role in the argument of proponents of “dangerous dogs” ownership, but this message needs to be more forcefully promoted and monitored. Punitive measures afforded by proper legislative changes are logical and necessary in mandating and securing responsible dog ownership.

Third, Jamaica’s significant “stray dog” population creates not only challenges to disease control and canine welfare but also a fertile opportunity for uncontrolled replication of many potential dangerous dogs. Successful reform in dangerous-dog control will not be acheived without restricting the growth of this population. Undoubtedly, the best blend of efforts involving state agencies and communities will yield the most palatable results in managing this group of dogs.

Finally, moving apace to effect needed changes in dangerous-dog control in Jamaica has been elusive; discussion abounds around unfortunate incidents, but consequent action never materialises. Jamaica need not re-invent the wheel on this biting issue, as many other countries have forged a path and provided accessible guidelines. Instead, our significant human resources should be deployed to hone a practical programme for Jamaica. Let us not wait for the next unfortunate incident. Let’s go beyond discussion and take measured steps to workable solutions.

Dr Sophia Ramlal

Veterinarian

Kingston 10

rievet@yahoo.com