SINGAPORE (AFP) — Singaporeans spooked by the prospect of a contentious two-party political system delivered a massive swing vote to keep the long-ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) in power, analysts say.

Large crowds turned up for opposition rallies ahead of Friday’s election, but hopes for stronger checks and balances on the PAP quickly dissipated when the stunning results of the snap election became clear.

The PAP, in power for 56 years, won 83 of the 89 parliament seats and scooped up 70 per cent of all votes cast, reversing a setback in 2011 when its share of the popular vote fell to an all-time low of 60 per cent.

The Workers’ Party (WP), which was aiming for 20 seats, won only six.

Opposition parties admit they are not yet in a position to oust the PAP, and their main goal was to influence policy with a strong presence in parliament.

Analysts say the PAP also benefited from a patriotic wave generated by the March death of PAP co-founder and independence leader Lee Kuan Yew, the father of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, and triumphant August celebrations of the 50th anniversary of Singapore as a republic.

“I think it is a flight to safety. The concern of the PAP being severely weakened has contributed to voters, particularly the middle ground or undecided voters, deciding to plump for the tried-and-tested plan,” said Eugene Tan, associate law professor at the Singapore Management University.

Under the PAP, Singapore grew into one of the world’s richest societies with near universal home ownership, low crime and a per capita gross domestic product exceeding $50,000.

But the government has also been criticised for quashing protests, jailing dissidents, muzzling the media and driving political opponents to bankruptcy with costly defamation suits.

Yet political freedom was not even one of the hot topics during the campaign, which centred on immigration, the high cost of living, strained public services and the needs of the poor and elderly in a fast-ageing society.

The opposition called for more curbs on immigration and foreign workers, more spending on welfare, and a minimum wage.

After its popularity dipped in 2011, the government moved quickly to address voter gripes.

It sharply reduced the intake of immigrants and foreign workers — accused of stealing Singaporeans’ jobs and causing overcrowding — and poured billions of dollars into improving public housing and mass transport.